A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Identification of key risk areas and failure modes using the FMEA method for the prevention and control of major infectious diseases in a stomatology department. | LitMetric

Purpose: To perform risk assessment and analysis of potential infection during stomatology workflow in a hospital in the context of a major infectious disease outbreak, and to determine the key failure modes and measures to prevent and control infection.

Method: Following the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method based on the stomatology workflow, the opinions of 30 domain-experts in related fields were collected through questionnaires to determine all potential failure modes in the severity (S), occurrence (O), and detectability (D) dimensions. The group score was then integrated through the median method and the risk priority number (RPN) was obtained. Finally, combined with expert experience, a score above 100 was considered to define a key potential failure mode. The data collection period for this study was from August to September 2023.

Results: The key failure modes identified were "Patient concealed epidemiological history (A) (RPN: 149.6; Rank: 1)," "At the pre-examination door, safe distancing cannot be practiced due to the large number of visitors (A) (RPN: 147; Rank: 2)," "The patient does not cooperate in checking the health code or itinerary code (A) (RPN: 128, Rank: 3)," "The patient provides a non-personal health code or itinerary code (A) (RPN:121.5; Rank: 4)," "Pre-examination personnel did not strictly implement the inquiry of epidemiological history (A) (RPN: 120; Rank: 5)," and "The patient did not wear a mask according to the specification (A) (RPN:108.0; Rank: 6)". The key risk area was "Before diagnosis and treatment (A)".

Conclusion: Insufficient records of patient epidemiological history may increase the spread of COVID-19 in the oral diagnosis and treatment environment. High-density areas where patients gather are prone to become sources of infection. Finally, improper use of personal protective equipment increases the risk of cross-infection with COVID-19. However, in the face of the potential spread of major infectious diseases in the future, the government and hospitals need to build a more comprehensive epidemiological notification system to provide the population with early action trajectories and warning reports.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05321-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

failure modes
20
major infectious
12
epidemiological history
12
rank "the
12
"the patient
12
key risk
8
fmea method
8
infectious diseases
8
stomatology workflow
8
key failure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!