A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of different surface treatments on the bond strength of CAD/CAM PMMA denture teeth to heat-polymerized acrylic denture base. | LitMetric

This in vitro study aims to evaluate various surface treatments on the shear bond strength and failure mode of CAD/CAM PMMA teeth to the heat-polymerized acrylic denture base. The study sample consisted of 100 teeth that were divided equally into five groups: Group 1: denture artificial teeth (control), Group 2: PMMA teeth without surface treatment, Group 3: PMMA teeth with MMA etching, Group 4: PMMA teeth with sandblasting (aluminum oxide particles), and Group 5: PMMA teeth with perpendicular grooves. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine and the failure mode was recorded. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). MMA increased the shear bond strength compared with other surface treatments (sandblasting and perpendicular grooves; P < 0.001). Sandblasting and perpendicular grooves showed no significant difference in the shear bond strength (P = 0.548 and 0.061; respectively). There were statistically significant differences in the frequencies of failure mode between the studied groups (P < 0.001). The control, PMMA, and PMMA + Sandblasting groups showed the weakest bonding. MMA application improved the shear bond strength for CAD/CAM PMMA teeth, the perpendicular groove seems to be not sufficiently effective, while the sandblasting cannot be considered as a surface treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85840-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pmma teeth
20
bond strength
16
group pmma
16
surface treatments
12
shear bond
12
cad/cam pmma
8
teeth
8
teeth heat-polymerized
8
heat-polymerized acrylic
8
acrylic denture
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!