A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Forearm elevation impairs local static handgrip endurance likely through reduction in vascular conductance and perfusion pressure: revisiting Rohmert's curve. | LitMetric

Maximal isometric contraction time (MICT) is critical for most motor tasks and depends on skeletal muscle blood flow at < 40% of maximal voluntary strength (MVC). Whether limb work positions associated with reduced perfusion pressure and facilitated vessel compression affect MICT is largely unknown. In 14 healthy young men we therefore assessed bilateral handgrip MICT at 15, 20, 30, 40, and 70% of MVC in horizontal forearm positions of 0.0, + 27.5 or - 27.5 cm relative to heart level. Forearm blood flow (FBF, venous occlusion plethysmography) and brachial blood pressure were measured repetitively. MICT at 15% MVC was significantly shorter by 66.3 and 86.2 s with forearm position + 27.5 cm (389.6 ± 23.3 s) as compared to 0.0 cm (455.9 ± 34.1 s) and - 27.5 cm (475.8 ± 35.0 s) while MICT at 20-70% MVC was unaffected. Peak FBF at 15% MVC was significantly lower in position + 27.5 cm (11.11 ± 0.92 ml/min/100 ml) compared to 0.0 cm (15.55 ± 0.91 ml/min/100 ml) or - 27.5 cm (14.21 ± 0.59 ml/min/100 ml) and vascular resistance significantly higher in position + 27.5 vs 0.0 or - 27.5 cm. Working position above, but not below heart level may limit MICT at 15% MVC possibly through blood flow reduction arising from increased vascular resistance beside reduced perfusion pressure. Local isometric endurance warrants (re)evaluation regarding hydrostatic/gravitational or other hemodynamic limitations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83939-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forearm elevation
4
elevation impairs
4
impairs local
4
local static
4
static handgrip
4
handgrip endurance
4
endurance reduction
4
reduction vascular
4
vascular conductance
4
conductance perfusion
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!