A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Management of Tomographically Suspicious Fellow Eyes of Young Patients With Unilateral Clinically Evident Keratoconus: Accelerated Epithelium-On Corneal Crosslinking Versus Observation. | LitMetric

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of accelerated epithelium-on crosslinking to stabilize tomographically suspicious fellow eyes of young patients with unilateral clinically evident keratoconus (KC) compared with observation alone.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 43 fellow eyes of 43 young patients with unilateral clinically evident KC who completed a 24-month follow-up. Twenty-four eyes underwent accelerated epithelium-on crosslinking [epi-on corneal crosslinking (CXL) group] and 19 eyes were observed (observation group). A third healthy control group was added for comparison. The primary outcome measures were tomographic parameters and topometric indices assessed by pentacam. Secondary outcome measures included corneal ectatic progression defined as 1-diopter or more increase in maximum or steep keratometry (Kmax or K2), visual & refractive outcomes, and complications.

Results: Baseline demographic and tomographic characteristics were similar between the epi-on CXL and observation groups (P > 0.05). Almost all mean tomographic parameters and topometric indices showed insignificant differences between baseline and after 24 months in the epi-on CXL and control groups (P > 0.05), whereas a significant progression was documented in the observation group (P < 0.05). At the end of the follow-up, progression was documented in 1 eye (4.2%) and in 8 eyes (42.1%) in the epi-on CXL and observation groups, respectively. Visual and refractive outcomes were more favorable in the epi-on CXL group. No significant complications were reported after accelerated epi-on CXL.

Conclusions: Accelerated epithelium-on CXL was safe and achieved better tomographic stability and less corneal ectatic progression in tomographically suspicious fellow eyes of young patients with unilateral clinically evident keratoconus compared with observation alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003756DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fellow eyes
16
eyes young
16
young patients
16
patients unilateral
16
unilateral clinically
16
clinically evident
16
accelerated epithelium-on
16
epi-on cxl
16
tomographically suspicious
12
suspicious fellow
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!