When undertaking qualitative research studies, researchers often use the concept of data saturation to justify sufficient sampling to cease data collection and analysis. We argue that this reveals a positivist perspective that is incompatible with qualitative research,1 which is instead based on constructivist, interpretivist, or other perspectives. Instead, we recommended the concepts of information power,2conceptual depth,3 and theoretical sufficiency,1,4,5 with data adequacy considered during research design and evaluated iteratively throughout the sampling, data collection, and analysis processes. The table below provides guidelines for when more, or less, data are needed to justify cessation of data collection and analysis. Both researchers and readers can use the criteria for assessing data adequacy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005972DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

data adequacy
12
data collection
12
collection analysis
12
assessing data
8
qualitative studies
8
data
7
adequacy qualitative
4
studies undertaking
4
undertaking qualitative
4
studies researchers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!