Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Gastric adenocarcinoma with enteroblastic differentiation (GAED) is a rare entity with worse prognosis compared to conventional gastric adenocarcinomas. Its histological characteristics are fetal gut-like architecture and tumor cells with cytoplasmic clearing, as well as positive immunohistochemical reaction to at least one of the enteroblastic markers. Hereby, we present a case of GAED with neuroendocrine marker positivity, with whole-exome sequencing (WES), and an updated literature review.
Case Presentation: A 68-year-old woman presented at the general practitioner with abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound described gastric wall thickening raising suspicion of gastric cancer; thus, gastroscopy was performed, and biopsy samples were taken, which confirmed malignancy. Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy was initiated, and total gastrectomy was performed. Microscopically, pleomorphic polygonal cells were visible with clear cytoplasm and high-grade cellular atypia. Alcian blue and PAS stains demonstrated positivity for acidic and neutral mucins. P53 IHC was negative, indicative of null-phenotype, while Syntaxin-1 and Chromogranin showed focal positivity. SALL4 and Glypican 3 were positive; however, AFP displayed only minimal, uncertain positivity. The Ki67 labeling index was 70%. Due to the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics, the tumor was concluded as GAED with neuroendocrine marker positivity. WES was carried out revealing 4 pathogenic, including TP53, KLHL7, RAPSN, and ACTA1, and 3 likely pathogenic mutations, encompassing PNKP, HNF1A, and ADNP.
Discussion: GAED is a rare subtype of gastric adenocarcinomas, representing 0.3-5.4% of all cases, and has an unclarified etiology. Our WES results identified new pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations. From a differential diagnostic point of view, hepatoid adenocarcinoma and the possibility of metastatic origin have to be excluded.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000543330 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!