Background: Hindgut symptoms are poorly understood complications of obesity. The impact of obesity on fecal incontinence (FI) and anorectal physiology remains unclear, with inconsistent results in prior studies. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between obesity and FI, and the physiological changes in anorectal function.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults who underwent high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) at a tertiary center for anorectal symptoms. Demographics, clinical history, surgical/obstetric history, medications and HRAM findings were reviewed. Patients were classified as non-obese (BMI <25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2), class I obesity (30-34.9 kg/m2), and class II+III obesity (>35 kg/m2). Fisher-exact/student t-test for univariate analyses and logistic/general linear regression for multivariable analyses were performed.

Results: 552 adults were included. Mean BMI was higher among patients with FI (27.5 vs 25.9 kg/m2, p=0.013). Compared to non-obese group, FI was more prevalent in class II+III obesity (31.7% vs 13.2%, p=0.0024), but not class I obesity or overweight groups. On multivariable analysis controlling for potential confounders, class II+III obesity (adjusted OR 2.89, CI:1.28-6.50, p=0.02) remained an independent risk factor for FI. Among patients with FI, both BMI (β-coefficient 1.09, p=0.016) and class II+III obesity (β-coefficient 18.9, p=0.027) independently predicted increased first rectal sensation volume on HRAM on multivariable regression.

Conclusions: Classes II+III obesity was an independent risk factor for FI. Among patients with FI, increasing BMI and class II+III obesity were associated with altered rectal sensitivity. Anorectal function testing should be considered to help guide management of FI among patients with obesity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003308DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ii+iii obesity
20
class ii+iii
16
obesity
11
fecal incontinence
8
altered rectal
8
rectal sensitivity
8
independent risk
8
risk factor
8
factor patients
8
anorectal
5

Similar Publications

When policy-makers propose health-related initiatives they need to assess the impact on health inequalities, including disparities in diet-related diseases and obesity. Health impact assessments, including health equity assessments, can provide insights into the potential health outcomes, but they are usually based on engagement with stakeholders and beneficiaries and their quality is not easy to evaluate. In this paper, we propose a policy assessment tool designed to ask a set of questions on the impact on health equity of policies and interventions that may be answerable from empirical evidence or from public health principles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Several preoperative pulmonary assessment protocols have been established over the years, but assessments of this magnitude are lacking in the bariatric population. Therefore, the assessment of lung capacity, maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures, the peak expiratory flow and mobility can be predictors of operative safety and determine the time of hospital discharge.

Objective: To evaluate lung capacity, respiratory muscle strength and level of mobility in the pre, immediate post-operative and hospital discharge of patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Predicting extubation failure remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to determine diagnostic accuracy of models used at the bed side.

Methods: Post hoc analysis of 2341 patients at all risk included in five multicenter randomized trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hindgut symptoms are poorly understood complications of obesity. The impact of obesity on fecal incontinence (FI) and anorectal physiology remains unclear, with inconsistent results in prior studies. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between obesity and FI, and the physiological changes in anorectal function.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this scoping review, "weight-related evidence" is an umbrella for various terms, phrases, and ways in which weight, body size, fatness, and/or obesity present in research and dietetic practice. Canadian Registered Dietitians' perceptions of, experiences with, and/or knowledge of weight-related evidence in nutrition care was identified and mapped. Implementing JBI scoping review methodology, four databases were searched: () CINAHL (EBSCO); () Medline (Ovid); () Embase (Elsevier); and () Scopus (Elsevier).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!