Evaluating an urgent care antibiotic stewardship intervention: a multi-network collaborative effort.

Objective: Urgent care centers (UCCs) have reported high rates of antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections. Prior UCC studies have generally been limited to single networks. Broadly generalizable stewardship efforts targeting common diagnoses are needed. This study examines the effectiveness of an antibiotic stewardship intervention in reducing inappropriate prescribing for bronchitis and viral upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) in UCCs.

Design: A quality improvement study comparing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rates in UCCs after the introduction of an antibiotic stewardship intervention.

Setting: Forty-nine UCCs in 27 different networks from 18 states, including 1 telemedicine site.

Participants: Urgent care clinicians from a national collaborative of UCCs, all members of the Urgent Care Association.

Methods: The intervention included signing a commitment statement and selecting from 5 different intervention options during 3 plan-do-study-act cycles. The primary outcome was the percentage of urgent care encounters for viral URTIs or bronchitis with inappropriate prescribing, stratified by clinician engagement and diagnosis. A 3-month baseline and 9-month intervention period were compared using a regression model using a generalized estimating equation.

Results: Among 15,385 encounters, the intervention was associated with decreases in inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for bronchitis (48% relative decrease, aOR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.83) and viral URTIs (33%, aOR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82) among actively engaged clinicians compared to baseline. The intervention did not result in significant changes for clinicians not actively engaged.

Conclusions: This intervention was associated with reductions in inappropriate prescribing among actively engaged clinicians. Implementing stewardship interventions in UCCs may reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for common diagnoses; however, active clinician engagement may be necessary.