Introduction: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC.

Methods: TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period). Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Clinical outcomes were assessed at TN Week (W) 10 and W52 and OLE W46 and W94. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated through induction and in the OLE until W94. Safety was assessed.

Results: This analysis included 376 biologic-exposed patients. In the placebo-controlled cohort, more ozanimod-treated patients achieved clinical response than placebo at W10 regardless of the number or type of prior biologics; patients who used 1 versus ≥2 prior biologics achieved higher efficacy rates. Efficacy rates were higher at W52 than W10 and were similar across subgroups regardless of the number or type of prior biologics. Significantly greater proportions of ozanimod vs placebo patients achieved symptomatic response by W5 (P=0.0173) and symptomatic remission by W10 (P=0.0207). Among biologic-exposed TN W10 ozanimod nonresponders who entered the OLE, 61% achieved symptomatic response with an extra 10 weeks of ozanimod treatment. Ozanimod efficacy was durable for ∼3 years of continuous treatment in biologic-exposed W52 clinical responders who entered the OLE. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusions: Ozanimod was effective and safe in biologic-exposed patients with UC, but these patients may require more time to respond to treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003310DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biologic-exposed patients
12
prior biologics
12
patients
9
prior biologic
8
ozanimod efficacy
8
efficacy safety
8
true north
8
patients achieved
8
number type
8
type prior
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and prior biologic failure may have reduced or delayed efficacy with subsequent advanced therapies. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod during the True North (TN) study and its open-label extension (OLE) in biologic-exposed patients with UC.

Methods: TN was a randomized, placebo-controlled 52-week trial (10-week induction, 42-week maintenance period).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative Efficacy of Advanced Therapies for Management of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: 2024 American Gastroenterological Association Evidence Synthesis.

Gastroenterology

December 2024

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address:

Background & Aims: We performed an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis to inform the 2024 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Guidelines on the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods: We searched multiple electronic databases through November 21, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials in adults with moderate-to-severe UC, comparing different advanced therapies (tumor necrosis factor antagonists, vedolizumab, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, interleukin 12/23 or selective interleukin 23 antagonists, and Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors) against placebo or another active comparator. Our primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of clinical remission, and our secondary outcome was endoscopic improvement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study assesses the economic implications of advanced therapies (biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors) for treating ulcerative colitis in Japan, focusing on cost-effectiveness.
  • A cost per responder model was developed to compare the expenses of various treatments based on clinical outcomes for both biologic-naïve and biologic-exposed patients.
  • Upadacitinib showed favorable cost-effectiveness in achieving clinical response and remission, outperforming other treatments except in one specific case for biologic-exposed patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Meta-analyses have found anti-TNF drugs to be the best treatment, on average, for Crohn's disease. We performed a subgroup analysis to determine if it is possible to achieve more efficacious outcomes by individualizing treatment selection.

Methods: We obtained participant-level data from 15 trials of FDA-approved treatments (N=5703).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigated the relationship between adalimumab (ADA) drug levels and Crohn's disease (CD) activity in patients who experienced a loss of response and underwent dose intensification.
  • It analyzed a group of 131 CD patients over five years, measuring ADA levels at critical points after the dose increase and assessing the impact on clinical and objective remission.
  • Findings indicate that higher ADA levels monitored at 6 and 12 months after dose-intensification are linked to improved remission rates, suggesting that post-treatment monitoring is more informative than initial baseline levels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!