AI Article Synopsis

  • Effective self-management is crucial for older adults, with or without TBI, to sustain health and independence, and self-regulation strategies can enhance this.
  • A study involving 41 older adults tested a specific intervention (MCII) aimed at preventing falls, assessing aspects like treatment adherence and participant feedback.
  • Results showed behavior changes across participants, with those without TBI finding the MCII protocol more acceptable and feasible; however, those with TBI required more adjustments to the treatment, indicating room for improvement in personalized care.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Effective self-management is key for older adults with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) to maintain their health, safety, and independence. Self-regulation is one method of promoting self-management. However, it is essential to examine effective methods of self-regulation interventions to maximize the use of such health promotion.

Method: Forty-one older adults (19 with TBI; 22 without TBI) participated in an in-person or telepractice health education intervention for fall prevention with 15 speech-language pathology student clinicians. The intervention was a self-regulation strategy, mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII), for promoting fall prevention. This mixed methods study explored treatment adherence and evaluated implementation outcomes through acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, modifications to treatment, and therapist adherence and client participation.

Results: All participants demonstrated some behavior change. Participants without TBI evaluated the MCII protocol as more acceptable, (1, 39) = 5.88, = .018; appropriate, (1, 39) = 5.34, = .023; and feasible, (1, 39) = 9.56, = .003, than participants with TBI, although all ratings were perceived as neutral or positive. From clinician data, protocol adherence, (1, 39) = 1.57, .22, and client participation, (1, 39) = 0.10, .92, were similar across injury groups, but participants with TBI required more fidelity-consistent modifications to treatment, (1, 39) = 6.88, .012. There were no differences between settings except that those in telepractice had more client participation, (1, 39) = 21.02, < .001. Clinicians felt MCII was equally appropriate for both groups in all settings, acceptability: (1, 48) = 0.082, = .78; appropriateness: (1, 48) = 0.554, = .46; feasibility: (1, 48) = 0.197, = .66.

Conclusion: MCII may be a feasible tool to provide health education as it offers enough structure and individualization to be considered appropriate and relevant for older adults, and for novice clinicians to administer and modify as needed based on client needs.

Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28074443.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

older adults
16
health education
12
participants tbi
12
mixed methods
8
implementation outcomes
8
self-regulation strategy
8
adults traumatic
8
traumatic brain
8
brain injury
8
fall prevention
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!