Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Despite the accuracy and robustness attained in the field of object tracking, algorithms based on Siamese neural networks often over-rely on information from the initial frame, neglecting necessary updates to the template; furthermore, in prolonged tracking situations, such methodologies encounter challenges in efficiently addressing issues such as complete occlusion or instances where the target exits the frame. To tackle these issues, this study enhances the SiamRPN algorithm by integrating the convolutional block attention module (CBAM), which enhances spatial channel attention. Additionally, it integrates the kernelized correlation filters (KCFs) for enhanced feature template representation. Building on this, we present DSiam-CnK, a Siamese neural network with dynamic template updating capabilities, facilitating adaptive adjustments in tracking strategy. The proposed algorithm is tailored to elevate the Siamese neural network's accuracy and robustness for prolonged tracking, all the while preserving its tracking velocity. In our research, we assessed the performance on the OTB2015, VOT2018, and LaSOT datasets. Our method, when benchmarked against established trackers, including SiamRPN on OTB2015, achieved a success rate of 92.1% and a precision rate of 90.9%. On the VOT2018 dataset, it excelled, with a VOT-A (accuracy) of 46.7%, a VOT-R (robustness) of 135.3%, and a VOT-EAO (expected average overlap) of 26.4%, leading in all categories. On the LaSOT dataset, it achieved a precision of 35.3%, a normalized precision of 34.4%, and a success rate of 39%. The findings demonstrate enhanced precision in tracking performance and a notable increase in robustness with our method.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s24248176 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!