The Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat for Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) often encounter anemia. Roxadustat has not only undergone phase II-III clinical trials in patients suffering from CKD and undergoing HD; a number of post-marketing clinical studies have been conducted using the drug. This article was to assess the effectiveness and safety of roxadustat in managing anemia among patients with CKD undergoing HD.

Methods: A thorough search was performed across eight databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wan Fang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP (CQ VIP), and SinoMed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the effectiveness and safety of roxadustat in managing anemia among individuals suffering from CKD and undergoing HD. This search included studies from the inception of these databases to April 2023.

Results: Two phase II, one phase III, and 16 post-marketing studies with 1688 participants were included. Serum iron (SI), transferrin, and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) levels changed from baseline (∆SI, ∆transferrin, and ∆TIBC) and were significantly more increased for roxadustat than for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs): MD 2.55, (95% CI 1.51 to 3.60), < 0.00001; MD 0.55, (95% CI 0.41 to 0.69), < 0.00001; and MD 6.54, (95% CI 4.50 to 8.59), < 0.00001, respectively. Roxadustat was not inferior to ESAs with regard to increasing Hb (∆Hb) levels [MD 1.17 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.63), < 0.00001] (g/dL). No statistically significant distinctions of the ∆ferritin, ∆hepcidin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline (∆TSAT) level were identified between roxadustat and ESAs. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels changed from baseline (∆CRP) and were significantly more reduced for roxadustat than for ESAs. As for safety, the analysis indicated no notable difference in the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) between roxadustat and ESAs.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that roxadustat outperformed ESAs in enhancing SI, transferrin, and TIBC levels while also decreasing CRP levels. Roxadustat was not inferior to ESAs in terms of improving Hb levels and safety. These findings suggest that roxadustat was well tolerated and a potent alternative to ESAs in managing anemia among patients suffering from CKD and undergoing HD.