A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reconstruction of the Passive Layer of AISI 304 and 316 Steel After Scratching. | LitMetric

Reconstruction of the Passive Layer of AISI 304 and 316 Steel After Scratching.

Materials (Basel)

Institute of Environmental Engineering, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, pl. Grunwaldzki 24, 50-363 Wroclaw, Poland.

Published: December 2024

Austenitic stainless steels are used widely in many fields due to their good mechanical properties and high resistance to corrosion. This work focuses on the reconstruction of the passive film after scratching. The purpose of the study was to compare changes in the rate of passive layer reconstruction and to discuss the effect of both the type of material and its electrochemical treatment on the reconstruction of the passive layer for two types of stainless steel: 304 and 316. The XPS tests performed indicate a significantly higher Cr/Fe ratio for the samples after the electropolishing process of 1.41-1.88 compared to the as-received samples of 0.82-0.86. After 2-3 min of sputtering the surface with Ar+ ions, a decrease in chromium content can be observed, with a simultaneous increase in nickel content, visible especially for the electropolished samples. A new approach in the conducted research was to scratch the test samples under controlled conditions, then evaluate the dynamics of the passive layer reconstruction using the AFM method, and then confront the obtained results with XPS measurements for the corresponding samples. For the as-received samples (2B finish) and those after surface treatment, regardless of the level of contamination of the electropolishing process bath, the reconstruction time was similar, which was approximately 2 h, although certain differences in the process dynamics were noticeable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17246238DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

passive layer
16
reconstruction passive
12
304 316
8
layer reconstruction
8
electropolishing process
8
as-received samples
8
reconstruction
6
samples
6
layer
4
layer aisi
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!