A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota in Humans Living with and Without Companion Animals. | LitMetric

Cohabitation with companion animals (CAs) has been suggested as a significant modifier of gut microbial diversity. This study investigated the influence of cohabitation with CAs on human gut microbiota composition. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we analyzed the gut microbiota of 20 families with CAs (40 adults, 20 children) and 20 families without CAs (40 adults, 20 children). Alpha and beta diversity analyses were performed, and the differentially abundant genera were identified. There were significant differences in beta diversity across the groups (-value = 0.001). The / ratio was considerably lower in the CAs group (0.67) than in the without-CAs group (1.02). _UCG-003 (log2 fold change: 7.3; adjusted -value ≤ 0.001), (log2 fold change: 6.3; adjusted -value ≤ 0.001), and (log2 fold change: 5.1; adjusted -value = 0.012) were elevated in the group cohabiting with CAs, whereas (with CAs: 3.81%; without CAs: 13.52%) and (with CAs: 3.77%; without CAs: 6.50%) were more prevalent in the group without CAs. Cohabitation with CAs may positively influence the gut microbiota by promoting the presence of beneficial bacteria and reducing the / ratio. This study highlights the potential for cohabitation with CAs to promote gut microbial health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life14121621DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gut microbiota
16
cas
13
cohabitation cas
12
log2 fold
12
fold change
12
change adjusted
12
adjusted -value
12
companion animals
8
gut microbial
8
families cas
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!