(1) Background: Patient lifts are evidence-based engineering controls used in Safe Patient Handling Programs to assist healthcare workers in moving patients. They have been shown to be beneficial for both healthcare workers and patients. However, these devices are not consistently used. This review aims to determine the scope of the literature and examine the barriers and facilitators for the use of patient lifts by healthcare workers, on a global level. (2) Methods: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science-Core Collection, Cochrane CENTRAL, Trials Register of Promoting Health Interventions, PAIS Index (Proquest), and the gray literature were reviewed. Duplicates were removed, titles and abstracts were screened, full texts were assessed, and the quality of the studies were checked. The analysis was carried out qualitatively using thematic analysis. (3) Results: A total of 57 articles were included in this review. Most studies (71.9%) originated in the US alone, and none originated in low- and middle-income countries. The majority were quantitative studies and were conducted in acute care hospitals. The main identified barriers were equipment-related (e.g., time constraints, device unavailability, and inconvenient storage), followed by cultural and behavioral factors (peer pressure, resistance to change, and occupational socialization), followed by organizational factors (staff shortage and workload). The main identified facilitators were mostly organizational factors (leadership support, minimal lift policy, standardized protocols), followed by cultural and behavioral factors (safety culture and worker's empowerment), then equipment-related factors (device availability and accessibility). Patient- and worker-related factors were the least mentioned. (4) Conclusion: There is a complex interplay of organizational, equipment-related, and cultural factors shaping the use of lifts by healthcare workers. A multifaceted approach that focuses on enhancing organizational support, fostering a robust safety culture, and ensuring equipment availability is warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11675142 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121659 | DOI Listing |
Am J Manag Care
January 2025
Ascension Borgess Hospital, 345 Naomi St, Plainwell, MI 49080. Email:
Objective: To describe the outcomes of a partnership between a drug plan and pharmacists to switch patients from brand name dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors to the generic alogliptin.
Study Design: Single-center, retrospective chart review.
Methods: Clinical pharmacists contacted patients with primary care providers within the health system affiliated with the drug plan to facilitate the switch.
Am J Public Health
January 2025
Christine Crudo Blackburn is with the Department of Health Policy and Management and USA Center for Rural Public Health Preparedness, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station. Mayra Rico is with the USA Center for Rural Public Health Preparedness, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University. Jessica Hernandez is a masters of public health student in the Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University. Miryoung Lee is with the Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Brownsville.
We examined the impacts of interior border checkpoints on access to higher-level medical care via ground ambulance for undocumented immigrants in South Texas. Using purposive sampling, we conducted interviews (n = 30) with ground ambulance personnel in the lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. Procedures implemented in 2018 mandate that hospitals notify Border Patrol of a patient's legal status before transfer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJCO Glob Oncol
January 2025
International Cancer Patient Coalition, Brussels, Belgium.
Despite the acknowledged merits of precision oncology (PO) and its increasing global implementation, its full potential for advancing care and prevention remains unrealized. The benefits are currently accessible to only limited patient segments because of multifaceted barriers. Successful implementation hinges on various factors-scientific complexities not limited to technical, clinical, regulatory, economic, administrative, and health care policy-related challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes-Palliative Care (ECHO-PC; ECHO Model-Based comprehensive educational and telementoring intervention) for health care professionals (HCPs) and change in patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G]) among patients with advanced cancer. We also examined the association between ECHO-PC and changes in symptom distress (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS]), patient experience and satisfaction, and caregiver distress scores.
Methods: ECHO-PC Clinic sessions were conducted twice a month for 1 year by an interdisciplinary team of PC clinicians at the MD Anderson Cancer Center, with participation of experts in PC in sub-Saharan Africa, using standardized curriculum on the basis of PC needs in the region.
N Z Med J
January 2025
Professor, School of Social and Cultural Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Aim: Patient barriers to accessing hospice and palliative care (PC) have been well studied. Important, yet less investigated, is how cancer patients whose hospice referrals were not accepted are being cared for. This article aims to understand the referral process from PC providers' perspectives and the implications of the current palliative system for patients, families and health professionals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!