The treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has radically changed over the last few years. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have become the standard of care as a front-line therapeutic approach, conferring a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to traditional endocrine therapy (ET) alone. However, the wide administration of these drugs in clinical practice paved the way for the emergence of new intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance that seem to compromise second-line treatment effectiveness. In this context, fulvestrant monotherapy appears disqualified. we evaluated a population of 30 women currently treated in our oncology unit with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, receiving fulvestrant 500 mg every 28 days after progression to first-line therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors combined with aromatase inhibitors. Of 30 patients observed, 23 progressed to fulvestrant with a median PFS of 3.7 months (range 1-9.7 months). our real-life experience suggests that second-line fulvestrant monotherapy confers very poor disease control and is quite an inadequate therapeutic option. CDK4/6i administration beyond progression could possibly be considered as more valid option, in the absence of targetable mutations or newer, more effective drugs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674525PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16244179DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fulvestrant monotherapy
12
metastatic breast
12
breast cancer
12
cdk4/6 inhibitors
8
real-life experience
8
inhibitors combined
8
endocrine therapy
8
fulvestrant
5
monotherapy cdk4/6
4
inhibitors
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: The management of hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer (BC) relies on endocrine therapy (ET), with a primary focus on disrupting estrogen receptor (ER) signaling due to its critical role in BC tumorigenesis and progression. While effective for both early-stage and advanced breast cancers, ET frequently encounters resistance mechanisms, including both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent trajectories, ultimately leading to disease progression.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases to review the current evidence on the use of novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for the treatment of HR+ BC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has radically changed over the last few years. CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy have become the standard of care as a front-line therapeutic approach, conferring a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to traditional endocrine therapy (ET) alone. However, the wide administration of these drugs in clinical practice paved the way for the emergence of new intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance that seem to compromise second-line treatment effectiveness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In patients with the rare adult-type granulosa cell tumors (aGCT), surgery is the primary treatment for both primary and recurrent disease. In cases of inoperable disease, systematic therapy is administered, but variable response rates and drug resistance complicate predicting the most effective therapy. Drug screen testing on patient-derived cell lines may offer a solution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Inhibition of the cyclin D-cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)4/6-INK4-retinoblastoma pathway can overcome acquired or de novo treatment resistance to endocrine monotherapy. Responses to endocrine monotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer (EC) are suboptimal, perhaps due to genomic alterations that promote estrogen receptor (ER)-independent cyclin D1-CDK4/6 activation. We hypothesized that addition of abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 kinase inhibitor, to antiestrogen therapy with fulvestrant will be an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Palliative treatment options for HR + HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients have increased, but data is lacking about the optimal treatment sequence. We used real-world data from a comprehensive cancer center to describe applied treatment sequences and we determined treatment-related and survival outcomes.

Methods: Patients aged 18 years and older with HR + HER2- ABC treated with systemic treatment were included in this historic cohort study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!