Heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the concurrent presence of both an intrauterine pregnancy and an extrauterine (typically ectopic) pregnancy. This report presents the case of a 36-year-old female patient who presented to the emergency department with lower abdominal pain. A comprehensive evaluation, including transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound imaging, revealed a heterotopic pregnancy at an estimated gestational age of six weeks and two days. The ultrasound examination confirmed an intrauterine pregnancy with fetal cardiac activity and a visible fetal pole, as well as a complex vascular lesion in the left adnexal region. Consequently, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, including a left salpingectomy, to remove the ruptured left tubal ectopic pregnancy. The ectopic pregnancy was successfully excised, and the intrauterine embryo was preserved. Following this surgical intervention, the pregnancy progressed without complications, culminating in the delivery of a healthy infant at 39 weeks of gestation. With timely and appropriate treatment, a heterotopic pregnancy can result in a successful live birth, yielding favorable outcomes for both mother and child. This case underscores the necessity of considering heterotopic pregnancy even in the absence of risk factors and highlights the importance of multidisciplinary management to achieve optimal outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703543PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

heterotopic pregnancy
20
ectopic pregnancy
12
pregnancy
11
intrauterine pregnancy
8
spontaneous heterotopic
4
pregnancy case
4
case report
4
report rare
4
rare critical
4
critical obstetric
4

Similar Publications

Heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the concurrent presence of both an intrauterine pregnancy and an extrauterine (typically ectopic) pregnancy. This report presents the case of a 36-year-old female patient who presented to the emergency department with lower abdominal pain. A comprehensive evaluation, including transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound imaging, revealed a heterotopic pregnancy at an estimated gestational age of six weeks and two days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A rare spontaneous triplet heterotopic pregnancy occurred in a patient using emergency contraception. This highlights the need to consider heterotopic pregnancy in differential diagnoses for patients presenting with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding, even with detected intrauterine pregnancies, especially after failed emergency contraception, necessitating thorough laboratory and ultrasonographic diagnostic work-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Researchers compared the pregnancy outcomes of patients treated expectantly with those who had only eutopic pregnancies and those who underwent surgery, matching them based on age, previous pregnancies, and gestational age.
  • * The results showed similar rates of live births and early miscarriages among the expectant management group, the eutopic group, and the surgical group, indicating that expectant management may be a viable option for patients with heterotopic pregnancies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is diagnosed based on laboratory values and ultrasonography (US) findings. Evaluation for suspected EP should begin with a quantitative measurement of the serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels and transvaginal US. MR imaging is not preferentially performed in the evaluation of EP; however, if the findings of transvaginal US are uncertain, MR imaging can be used, as it has the advantages of superior soft-tissue contrast resolution and a wide scanning range.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Due to the specific nature of interstitial pregnancy (IP), there are significant risks to both the mother and the foetus in women with a heterotopic interstitial pregnancy (HIP). IP alone has been analysed as a site-specific ectopic pregnancy (EP) in previous studies; however, according to the latest European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology criteria, IP is classified as a tubal pregnancy. If IP can be classified as a tubal pregnancy, then there is no difference in the effects of these two methods on intrauterine pregnancies (IUPs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!