A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Once daily Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement of venous leg ulcers versus gel vehicle (placebo) and non-surgical standard of care: a three-arm multicenter, double blinded, randomized controlled study. | LitMetric

Background: Debridement is considered the first step in treatment of chronic wounds, however, current enzymatic and autolytic debridement agents are slow or ineffective. Previous studies have shown positive initial results with EscharEx® (EX-02 formulation), a Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement agent in development for chronic wounds. The main objective of this study was to assess its efficacy in debriding venous leg ulcers (VLU), compared to gel vehicle (GV) as a placebo control and to non-surgical standard of care (NSSOC).

Methods: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial in patients with VLU from 20 medical centers and clinics in the United States, Switzerland and Israel was undertaken. Patients were treated with daily topical applications of either EX-02, GV, or NSSOC (in a 3:3:2 ratio), until reaching complete debridement or up to 8 daily treatments (within 2 weeks), and then followed-up for up to 14 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of complete debridement. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03588130) and EudraCT (number 2020-004861-38).

Findings: A total of 196 patients were enrolled, and 119 randomized (between November 12th, 2019, and February 15th, 2022); 46 to the EX-02 arm, 43 to the GV arm, and 30 to the NSSOC arm. Eight patients dropped out of the study (2 in EX-02, 2 in GV, 4 in NSSOC). The incidence of complete debridement within 8 daily treatments was 63% (29/46 patients) in the EX-02 arm as compared to 30.2% (13/43 patients) in the GV arm (p = 0.004) and 13.3% (4/30 patients) in the NSSOC arm (p < 0.001). Sixty-five patients reported wound related adverse events throughout the study; 24 (52.2%), 27 (62.8%) and 14 (46.7%) patients in the EX-02, GV and NSSOC arms (p = NS). No deaths occurred during the study.

Interpretation: EX-02 lead to a significantly higher incidence of complete debridement as compared to GV and NSSOC, without significant safety issues. Additional studies are needed to explore the benefits of EX-02 in VLU and other chronic wound etiologies.

Funding: MediWound Ltd.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701486PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102750DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

complete debridement
12
bromelain-based enzymatic
8
enzymatic debridement
8
venous leg
8
leg ulcers
8
gel vehicle
8
vehicle placebo
8
non-surgical standard
8
standard care
8
chronic wounds
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!