Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To develop a single NTCP model for grade ≥ 2 late rectal bleeding (G2 LRB) after conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Methods And Materials: The development dataset consisted of prostate cancer patients (n = 656) previously randomized to conventional (39 x 2 Gy) or hypofractionated (19 x 3.4 Gy) external beam radiotherapy with N = 89 G2 LRB cases. Candidate predictors were obtained from literature. We fitted five separate logistic regression models to the data, each with one of the following dose parameters as candidate predictors in biological effective dose (BED), assuming α/β = 3 Gy: Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) with n = 0.1, EUD with n = 0.2, the relative volume receiving ≥ 111.9 Gy in BED (V111.9, the equivalent of physical V70 for a conventional schedule), minimum BED to the hottest 0.1 cm (D) or 2 cm (D). Previous abdominal surgery was included in every model and fractionation schedule was tested as predictor in each model. A sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the α/β-ratio, n and dose-volume cutoff.
Results: The pre-selected candidate dosimetric predictor and previous abdominal surgery were significantly associated with the outcome in all five models. Fractionation schedule was eliminated by the backward scheme in only the EUD (n = 0.1), D and D-based models. In internal validation these models showed AUC's of 0.64, 0.60 & 0.62, respectively. The sensitivity analyses showed that EUD models with n ≥ 0.15 and / or α/β ≥ 4 Gy failed, and EUD models based on α/β = 2 Gy with n = 0.05-0.2 showed good fits as well.
Conclusions: Our trial data set with different fractionation schedules offered the unique possibility to generate unbiased BED-based models. EUD (n = 0.1), D and D performed overall best in predicting G2 LRB; with α/β = 2 Gy equally good models were obtained. External validation is required to confirm our results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701999 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100886 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!