A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Normal tissue complication probability modeling for late rectal bleeding after conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to create a predictive model for late rectal bleeding in prostate cancer patients undergoing different types of radiotherapy.
  • Candidate predictors were identified from prior research and five logistic regression models were tested based on various dose parameters.
  • Results indicated that certain dosimetric predictors and history of abdominal surgery were significant for predicting the outcome, with some models showing satisfactory internal validation, but external validation is necessary for confirmation.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To develop a single NTCP model for grade ≥ 2 late rectal bleeding (G2 LRB) after conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Methods And Materials: The development dataset consisted of prostate cancer patients (n = 656) previously randomized to conventional (39 x 2 Gy) or hypofractionated (19 x 3.4 Gy) external beam radiotherapy with N = 89 G2 LRB cases. Candidate predictors were obtained from literature. We fitted five separate logistic regression models to the data, each with one of the following dose parameters as candidate predictors in biological effective dose (BED), assuming α/β = 3 Gy: Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) with n = 0.1, EUD with n = 0.2, the relative volume receiving ≥ 111.9 Gy in BED (V111.9, the equivalent of physical V70 for a conventional schedule), minimum BED to the hottest 0.1 cm (D) or 2 cm (D). Previous abdominal surgery was included in every model and fractionation schedule was tested as predictor in each model. A sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the α/β-ratio, n and dose-volume cutoff.

Results: The pre-selected candidate dosimetric predictor and previous abdominal surgery were significantly associated with the outcome in all five models. Fractionation schedule was eliminated by the backward scheme in only the EUD (n = 0.1), D and D-based models. In internal validation these models showed AUC's of 0.64, 0.60 & 0.62, respectively. The sensitivity analyses showed that EUD models with n ≥ 0.15 and / or α/β ≥ 4 Gy failed, and EUD models based on α/β = 2 Gy with n = 0.05-0.2 showed good fits as well.

Conclusions: Our trial data set with different fractionation schedules offered the unique possibility to generate unbiased BED-based models. EUD (n = 0.1), D and D performed overall best in predicting G2 LRB; with α/β = 2 Gy equally good models were obtained. External validation is required to confirm our results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701999PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100886DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eud n = 01
12
late rectal
8
rectal bleeding
8
conventional hypofractionated
8
hypofractionated radiotherapy
8
radiotherapy prostate
8
prostate cancer
8
candidate predictors
8
models
8
previous abdominal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!