Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: This study investigates the prevalence and underlying factors of fatigue in individuals with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (hEDS), highlighting the necessity for focused research on this symptom within these patient populations.
Design: Cross-sectional, multicentre study.
Setting: Data were collected from participants diagnosed with MFS or hEDS across multiple healthcare centres.
Participants: The study enrolled 282 participants (127 with MFS and 155 with hEDS).
Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Fatigue was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Additional assessments included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) for sleep disturbances.
Results: Participants with hEDS exhibited significantly higher median fatigue scores (FSS median=5.9, IQR=5.00-6.44) compared with the MFS group (FSS median=4.0, IQR=2.88-5.00). Significant predictors of fatigue included being female, having hEDS, participating in psychotherapy, and elevated scores on depression and insomnia scales. In the overall sample, hEDS significantly predicted fatigue (B=0.430, p=0.022), with depression and insomnia as strong influencers (PHQ-9: B=0.12, p<0.001; ISI: B=0.092, p<0.001). Notably, 80% of the hEDS group reported clinically relevant fatigue levels, compared with 31.5% in the MFS group. Daily persistence of fatigue was especially pronounced in hEDS, with 72.2% reporting everyday fatigue versus 25.2% in MFS. Temporal fatigue patterns also differed, with a more evenly distributed pattern throughout the day in hEDS, correlating with higher insomnia scores.
Conclusions: The results underscore the severe impact of fatigue on individuals with hEDS compared with those with MFS, suggesting the need for targeted, multidisciplinary management strategies to enhance quality of life.
Trial Registration Number: NCT05712564.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087298 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!