A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Dental arch dimensional changes in deep bite adults treated with orthodontic fixed appliances in conjunction with maxillary incisor vs. canine bite turbos during the levelling and aligning phase: a randomized clinical trial. | LitMetric

Introduction: This randomized clinical trial compared arch dimensional changes, dentoskeletal changes, and the rate of overbite correction in deep bite adults treated with fixed appliances and either maxillary incisor bite turbos (IBT) or canine bite turbos (CBT).

Materials And Methods: Forty-six deep bite subjects treated with fixed appliances were randomized into IBT (n = 23) and CBT (n = 23) groups. Changes in intercanine width (ICW), arch height (AH), and Little's Irregularity Index (LII) were analyzed from before treatment (T) to 3 months after aligning with 0.012" NiTi archwires in both arches (T). Cephalometric changes between T and the visit when normal overbite was achieved (T) were assessed. Within-group and between-group comparisons were analyzed at a significance level of 0.05.

Results: In both groups, mandibular ICW, and maxillary and mandibular AH significantly increased while maxillary and mandibular LII decreased. Maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination and molar extrusion were observed. The IBT group showed significantly greater changes in mandibular ICW, maxillary and mandibular AH, and mandibular incisor proclination than the CBT group. However, the overbite correction rate and the LII reduction were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions: The IBT and CBT produced similar effects on arch dimensions and dentoskeletal changes. However, the IBT group demonstrated greater arch dimensional changes.

Clinical Relevance: Clinicians may consider IBT if flaring incisors is desired. Alternatively, CBT is better for cases with limited incisor proclination and where minimizing arch dimension change is needed, such as in narrow ridge situations.

Clinical Trial Registration: The trial was registered at Thai Clinical Trial Registry on https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org , under the identifier TCTR20230811013.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06145-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

maxillary mandibular
16
arch dimensional
12
deep bite
12
fixed appliances
12
bite turbos
12
clinical trial
12
incisor proclination
12
dimensional changes
8
bite adults
8
adults treated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!