A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A latent profile analysis of parent-adolescent communication in person and using communication technology. | LitMetric

A latent profile analysis of parent-adolescent communication in person and using communication technology.

J Fam Psychol

Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota.

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

  • Research on parent-adolescent communication through technology has been limited, despite rapid changes in communication tools.
  • This study involved 404 parent-adolescent pairs and identified four distinct patterns of communication based on frequency and preferred methods (in-person, phone calls, texts, video calls).
  • Findings indicate demographic differences in communication styles and show that these communication profiles are linked to varying levels of perceived closeness between parents and adolescents.

Article Abstract

Despite the rapid changes in the use of communication technologies in families, research on how parents use communication technologies to stay connected with adolescents has been limited. Grounded in interdisciplinary theories in family and media studies, the primary aim of this study was to identify and describe unique patterns of parent-adolescent communication using parent reports of communication. Further, we considered whether parent-adolescent closeness was associated with parent-adolescent communication patterns. Participants were 404 dyads; one parent ( = 43.37; 61.9% female) and one adolescent ( = 15.32; 48.3% female) from the same family. Latent profile analysis supported a four-profile model of parent-adolescent communication. Profiles were characterized by communication frequency and preferred method of communication (i.e., in-person, phone calls, texts, video calls) across reasons for communicating (i.e., receive or offer advice and recommendations, emotional support, keep up-to-date, make plans). Demographic differences by parent race and marital status were found across different parent-adolescent communication profiles. Additionally, parent-adolescent communication profiles were associated with significantly different levels of parent reports of perceived closeness. Findings highlighting parents' perspectives on communication are essential to understanding how communication technologies can foster connections in parent-adolescent relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fam0001288DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

parent-adolescent communication
24
communication
14
communication technologies
12
communication profiles
12
latent profile
8
profile analysis
8
parent-adolescent
8
parent reports
8
analysis parent-adolescent
4
communication person
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!