Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Unlabelled: In Chile, there is limited information regarding the effects on the quality of life of patients undergoing colorectal resective surgery. Although the GES guideline of management of Colorectal Cancer (2013) includes a quality-of-life survey, presented in a non-translated version to Spanish, without instructions regarding its application method, and recently validated (2023). On the other hand, post-surgical and oncological follow-ups focus on evaluating symptoms, signs, and complementary tests associated with recurrences, leaving the non-standardized evaluation of quality of life to the discretion of the healthcare provider. Therefore, the need arises for a standardized instrument that evaluates the quality of life of patients diagnosed, treated, and monitored for colorectal cancer.
Aim: This article presents and discusses the results of the content validation of the FACT-C survey by experts from the colorectal surgery team of the UC-Christus Health Network for its application in Chilean patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (in a second phase).
Methods: Validation was performed through an evaluation and calculation of the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) of each item using a Likert-type survey that evaluated their coherence, clarity, and relevance, as well as the sufficiency of each dimension.
Results: An average of CVCs above 0.9 were observed, wich means an excellent an average of general CVCs above 0.9, which means an excellent correlation between the experts regarding the ability of the survey to measure quality of life. In addition, minor modifications were made to allow for a better understanding of four items.
Conclusion: Our results affirm that the FACT-C survey has an excellent CVC, allowing us to continue with the next stage of the validation process in a sample of Chilean patients to ensure its applicability in our population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000600655 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!