A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Vasa previa guidelines and their supporting evidence. | LitMetric

Vasa previa guidelines and their supporting evidence.

J Perinat Med

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2541 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

  • Vasa previa (VP) is a serious complication where fetal blood vessels are vulnerable near the cervix, requiring cesarean delivery before labor to avoid severe risks.
  • Different obstetric organizations have varying guidelines on managing VP, especially regarding hospitalization, steroid use, and delivery timing for asymptomatic patients.
  • Current guidelines lack robustness, relying on low-quality evidence and not incorporating new research insights, highlighting the need for more substantial evidence for improved management strategies.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Vasa previa (VP) is a serious pregnancy complication in which fetal vessels, unprotected by the umbilical cord, run across or within close proximity to the internal cervical os, which can potentially result in fetal exsanguination in the event of membrane rupture. There is global consensus that women with antenatally diagnosed VP should have caesarean delivery prior to onset of labour to prevent the catastrophic complications of VP. However, there is variability in the approach to management of these women antenatally, particularly regarding hospitalisation and timing of steroid administration and delivery.

Content: In this review, we aim to compare the VP guidelines of four prominent obstetric advisory bodies: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) with a particular focus on antenatal hospitalisation, administration of steroids, and timing of birth in asymptomatic patients. We also aim to evaluate the evidence cited to support their recommendations.

Summary: Current guidelines are based on low-quality evidence that often does not include insights from recent studies and are vague in their recommendations for antenatal hospitalisation and timing of delivery.

Outlook: More robust evidence for management of VP is needed to inform future guidelines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0473DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

obstetricians gynaecologists
12
vasa previa
8
women antenatally
8
hospitalisation timing
8
college obstetricians
8
antenatal hospitalisation
8
guidelines
4
previa guidelines
4
guidelines supporting
4
evidence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!