Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Hyperelastic materials are extensively incorporated in medical implants and microelectromechanical systems due to their large, elastic, recoverable strains. However, their mechanical properties are sensitive to processing parameters that may lead to inconsistent characterization. Various test setups have been employed for characterizing hyperelastic materials; however, they are often costly. Recent advancements in additive manufacturing and open-source software/hardware suggest the possibility of simpler solutions in research settings for characterizing them; raising the question of whether one can characterize these materials with low-cost tools and tests that take advantage of soft and small form-factor samples. Here, the authors investigate the potential of an open-source, 3D-printed test system designed for characterizing such materials. This system is tailored for small form-factor samples (sub-mm thickness) and large elastic deformations, common in polymeric parts of minimally invasive implants. The authors developed parts using additive manufacturing for uniaxial and planar tension testing, with a low-cost image correlation method adapted for measuring large strains. Polydimethylsiloxane was chosen for demonstration of a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin model, due to its documentation and use in biocompatible devices. The estimated Young's and shear moduli were repeatable and consistent with the literature. Curve-fitting was challenging and dependent on the optimization choices, when data points were limited, consistent with prior reports. However, with a large number of data points and ideal optimization error choice, and were found to be close to those reported previously. This work demonstrates a low-cost, 3D-printed, open-source test setup for characterizing hyperelastic materials using a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin model with reasonable accuracy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697124 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2024.e00608 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!