AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Educational and psychological research often involves comparing motivation across groups. It is critical to ensure that observed differences in motivation are true variations by group, not due to measurement biases. With a diverse sample of undergraduate students (N = 2200), this study measured internal consistency and gathered validity evidence based on the internal structure of five motivation scales. To compare motivation for biology between groups of undergraduate students, this study tested for measurement scalar invariance by group and, accordingly, conducted latent factor mean comparisons to understand true group differences. On average, female students held lower expectancy beliefs and self-efficacy for biology learning than males. Female students perceived higher attainment value and utility value for biology learning and higher psychological cost. First-generation college students held lower expectancy beliefs and self-efficacy but perceived higher attainment value for biology learning than continuing-generation students. No differences in average motivation for biology learning were found between underrepresented racial minority (URM) and non-URM students. The implications of these findings and future research directions are also discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ase.2544DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biology learning
20
motivation biology
12
differences motivation
8
undergraduate students
8
differences average
8
female students
8
students held
8
held lower
8
lower expectancy
8
expectancy beliefs
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!