A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments to PROMIS Upper Extremity Physical Function Improves the Responsiveness of PROMIS scores compared to Legacy scores in patients undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study. | LitMetric

Introduction: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.

Methods: Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).

Results: A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.

Conclusion: The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

time points
16
compared legacy
12
large responsiveness
12
responsiveness
9
addition promis
8
promis pain
8
promis upper
8
upper extremity
8
extremity physical
8
physical function
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!