A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Legal framework and IVF outcomes: a comparative analysis of fresh and frozen embryo transfers in Switzerland. | LitMetric

Legal framework and IVF outcomes: a comparative analysis of fresh and frozen embryo transfers in Switzerland.

Reprod Biomed Online

Division of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Women´s Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Published: October 2024

Research Question: To what extent do legislative measures impact standard reproductive outcome parameters?

Design: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Swiss national IVF registry analysing the outcomes of 13,908 women undergoing embryo transfers resulting from their first lifetime oocyte retrieval before (2014-2016) or after (2020-2022) revision of the legislation, allowing extended culture for 12 zygotes. Live birth rates (LBR) and cumulative LBR (cLBR) were compared in fresh and frozen embryo transfer strategies in both periods. Adjusted multivariable mixed model analyses were performed to determine OR and incidence rate ratios (IRR).

Results: Before revision of the legislation, LBR was higher for fresh embryo transfers compared with frozen embryo transfers (27.2% versus 22.7%; P = 0.006). After revision of the legislation, LBR was lower for fresh embryo transfers (29.3% versus 36.3%; P < 0.001), and cLBR was higher for the freeze-all embryo transfer strategy (59.0% versus 39.8%; P < 0.001). However, in a multivariable analysis, no difference in the odds of live birth was found between fresh and frozen embryo transfers (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.95-1.22), and the freeze-all embryo transfer strategy was not found to be more effective than the fresh embryo transfer strategy (IRR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.27). In a subgroup analysis, fresh blastocyst embryo transfers showed higher LBR than cleavage stage embryo transfers (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.62-2.49).

Conclusion: The change in national legislation provided the unique opportunity to evaluate the legal impact on reproductive outcomes. Besides a reduction in the number of multiple births, LBR in frozen embryo transfers improved, resulting in comparable success of fresh and frozen embryo transfer strategies. In addition to technological improvement, the legal framework influences the evolution of clinical practice, thereby contributing to enhanced reproductive outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104483DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

embryo transfers
36
frozen embryo
24
embryo transfer
20
fresh frozen
16
embryo
14
revision legislation
12
fresh embryo
12
transfer strategy
12
transfers
9
legal framework
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!