AI Article Synopsis

  • In-person interactions are crucial, but effectively identifying COVID-19 infections through screening can help ensure safety in schools and workplaces during outbreaks.
  • The study uses simulations to evaluate different screening strategies with antigen tests, focusing on how many infected individuals are detected based on factors such as test frequency and sensitivity.
  • Results indicate that early and frequent testing significantly improves infection detection rates, with high sensitivity tests yielding the best outcomes, ultimately supporting a safe return to in-person activities.

Article Abstract

Background: In-person interaction offers invaluable benefits to people. To guarantee safe in-person activities during a COVID-19 outbreak, effective identification of infectious individuals is essential. In this study, we aim to analyze the impact of screening with antigen tests in schools and workplaces on identifying COVID-19 infections.

Methods: We assess the effectiveness of various screening test strategies with antigen tests in schools and workplaces through quantitative simulations. The primary outcome of our analyses is the proportion of infected individuals identified. The transmission process at the population level is modeled using a deterministic compartmental model. Infected individuals are identified through screening tests or symptom development. The time-varying sensitivity of antigen tests and infectiousness is determined by a viral dynamics model. Screening test strategies are characterized by the screening schedule, sensitivity of antigen tests, screening duration, timing of screening initiation, and available tests per person.

Results: Here, we show that early and frequent screening is the key to maximizing the effectiveness of the screening program. For example, 44.5% (95% CI: 40.8-47.5) of infected individuals are identified by daily testing, whereas it is only 33.7% (95% CI: 30.5-37.3) when testing is performed at the end of the program duration. If high sensitivity antigen tests (Detection limit: copies/mL) are deployed, it reaches 69.3% (95% CI: 66.5-72.5).

Conclusions: High sensitivity antigen tests, high frequency screening tests, and immediate initiation of screening tests are important to safely restart educational and economic activities in-person. Our computational framework is useful for assessing screening programs by incorporating situation-specific factors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699287PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00716-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antigen tests
24
sensitivity antigen
16
screening
13
schools workplaces
12
infected individuals
12
individuals identified
12
screening tests
12
tests
10
tests schools
8
effectiveness screening
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!