Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110567 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Impermissibility of euthanasia and self-regarding duties to stay alive.
J Med Ethics
January 2025
Alden March Bioethics Institute, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
Non-voluntary passive euthanasia: the social consequences of euphemisms.
Eur J Health Law
November 2007
Imperial College School of Medicine, London.
Non-voluntary passive euthanasia, the commonest form of euthanasia, is seldom mentioned in the UK. This article illustrates how the legal reasoning in Airedale NHS Trust v Bland contributed towards this conceptual deletion. By upholding the impermissibility of euthanasia, whilst at the same time permitting 'euthanasia' under the guise of 'withdrawing futile treatment', it is argued that the court (logically) allowed (withdrawing futile treatment and euthanasia).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOn the impermissibility of euthanasia in Catholic healthcare organizations.
Christ Bioeth
December 2006
Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Roman Catholic healthcare institutions in the United States face a number of threats to the integrity of their missions, including the increasing religious and moral pluralism of society and the financial crisis many organizations face. These organizations in the United States often have fought fervently to avoid being obligated to provide interventions they deem intrinsically immoral, such as abortion. Such institutions no doubt have made numerous accommodations and changes in how they operate in response to the growing pluralism of our society, but they have resisted crossing certain lines and providing particular interventions deemed objectively wrong.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!