Study Objective: We developed an innovative method for ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural catheter placement and assessed its potential to reduce procedural duration for trainees.
Design: A cadaveric observational study and a clinical randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Sapporo Medical University Hospital.
Patients: A total of 52 adult patients scheduled for thoracic or abdominal surgery and four cadavers.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either group receiving conventional palpation (conventional group) or combination of the ultrasound examination and conventional palpation (ultrasound group).
Measurements: The primary outcome was total procedure time (sum of skin marking time and needling time) by trainees. The secondary outcomes were (1) skin marking time, (2) needling time, (3) multiple skin punctures, (4) needle redirection, (5) complications, and (6) failed cases.
Main Results: Through dissection of four cadavers, the most dorsal site of the transverse process root was identifiable by ultrasound and the reliable indicator of the interlaminar space. We devised ultrasound-assisted middle thoracic epidural catheter placement utilizing the most dorsal sites of bilateral transverse process roots as anatomical landmarks. Trainees in the ultrasound group had significantly longer skin marking time and significantly shorter needling time than those in the conventional group (107 [87-158] vs 46 s [34-54] s, p < 0.001 and 197 [156-328] vs 341 [303-488] s, p = 0.003). Consequently, there was no significant difference between the two groups in total procedure time (326 [263-467] s vs 391 [354-533] s, p = 0.167). Moreover, the probability of trainee failure in epidural anesthesia was significantly lower in the ultrasound group (2/26 [17.7 %] vs 10/26 [38.5 %], p = 0.019).
Conclusions: Our novel technique for thoracic epidural catheter placement resulted in expedited needling and enhanced success rates among trainees, although there was no significant difference between total procedure time when using ultrasound guidance and that when using conventional palpation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111740 | DOI Listing |
Curr Pain Headache Rep
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose Of Review: The rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane (RISS) block is an effective, safer alternative for managing postoperative acute pain following abdominal surgeries. The RISS block offers several advantages over traditional approaches, including reduced incidence of puncture-related complications, lower rates of systemic opioid consumption, and more consistent analgesic coverage of lower thoracic dermatomes.
Recent Findings: Despite a favorable safety profile, the RISS block carries potential risks, such as pneumothorax and local anesthetic systemic toxicity, particularly when long-acting anesthetics such as bupivacaine or ropivacaine are used.
J Clin Anesth
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, 291 South 1 West 16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido 060-8543, Japan.
Study Objective: We developed an innovative method for ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural catheter placement and assessed its potential to reduce procedural duration for trainees.
Design: A cadaveric observational study and a clinical randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Sapporo Medical University Hospital.
Cureus
December 2024
Intensive Care Unit, Unidade Local Saúde Viseu Dão-Lafões, Viseu, PRT.
Am J Emerg Med
December 2024
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Background: Various regional anesthesia techniques have been studied for blunt chest wall trauma over the past decades, but their impact on patient outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis aimed to identify the most effective regional anesthesia techniques for different outcomes in blunt thoracic trauma patients.
Methods: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials comparing regional anesthesia techniques (thoracic epidural, erector spinae plane block, serratus anterior plane block, intercostal block, paravertebral block, intrapleural block, retrolaminar block) and standard intravenous analgesia.
Eur J Pain
February 2025
Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Background: Lung cancer surgery is associated with a high incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), which necessitates long-term analgesic prescriptions. However, while essential for managing pain, these have shown various adverse effects. Current guidelines recommend using peripheral nerve blocks over epidural anaesthesia for perioperative analgesia in minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!