Severity: 8192
Message: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 8900
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 8900
Function: str_replace
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3362
Function: formatAIDetailSummary
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.
Methods: Between January 2021 and December 2022, 128 patients underwent CRT, of whom 73 with preoperative evaluation using G-MPI were selected. Forty-three patients with non-LBBB (21 and 22 CRT responders and non-responders, respectively) and 30 patients with LBBB were analyzed.
Results: Among patients with non-LBBB, CRT responders and non-responders exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for the LV dimension. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 108° and 27.7° as the optimal cutoff values for the bandwidth and phase standard deviation (SD), respectively, to predict non-responsiveness to CRT (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.601-0.923 and AUC = 0.742; 95% CI 0.576-0.909, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that a cutoff bandwidth of ≥ 108° and phase SD of ≥ 27.7° are independent predictors of non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB (hazard ratio 5.65; 95% CI 1.53-20.9; P = 0.009). In contrast, there were no significant associations between G-MPI parameters and non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with LBBB.
Conclusions: Preoperative G-MPI might be associated with non-responsiveness to CRT in patients with non-LBBB, indicating that identifying potential non-responders can improve patient management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01972-y | DOI Listing |
J Interv Card Electrophysiol
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-1 Kishibe-Shimmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Background: Non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCardiovasc Pathol
December 2024
Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, 121552, Academician Chazov str., 15a, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Aim: to assess the relation of focal and diffuse left ventricular (LV) fibrosis to left bundle branch block (LBBB).
Materials And Methods: 60 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and LBBB (DCM-LBBB), 50 DCM-nonLBBB patients, 15 patients with LBBB and structurally normal heart (idiopathic LBBB) and 10 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). LGE LV images were post-proceed for core scar (CS) and gray zone (GZ) calculation.
Rev Cardiovasc Med
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, 210029 Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Background: It is not uncommon that atrial fibrillation (AF) coexists with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Whether LBBB is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in AF patients remains undetermined. This study aims to investigate the impact of LBBB on the AF-related outcomes in non-valvular AF patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFESC Heart Fail
December 2024
Boston Scientific Corporation, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
November 2024
Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!