A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.

Heart Vessels

Department of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.

Published: January 2025

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is an emerging physiological pacing technique characterized by stable pacing parameters and a narrower QRS duration. This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of biventricular pacing (BIVP) and LBBP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 patients with chronic HFrEF accompanied by CLBBB treated at our center from April 2018 to October 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: the LBBP group and the BIVP group. Postoperative follow-up data were collected, including pacing parameters, QRS duration, echocardiographic indices (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mitral and tricuspid regurgitation), NT-proBNP levels, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. n addition, postoperative complications, heart failure readmission rates, and mortality rates were observed. 35 patients were recruited, 18 for LBBP and 17 for BIVP. The LBBP group demonstrated significantly lower pacing thresholds and impedance at 12 months post-surgery compared to the BIVP group (p < 0.05). The QRS duration in the LBBP group was significantly narrower than that in the BIVP group at 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.05). At 24 months post-surgery, LVEDD and LVESD were significantly lower in the LBBP group than those in the BIVP group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in response rates, tricuspid and mitral regurgitation, NYHA class, NT-proBNP levels, all-cause mortality, or heart failure rehospitalization rates (p > 0.05). LBBP may be a relatively safe and effective resynchronization therapy, serving as a complementary approach to BIVP for patients with HFrEF and CLBBB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

left bundle
16
bundle branch
16
heart failure
12
left ventricular
12
pacing
8
branch pacing
8
biventricular pacing
8
patients heart
8
complete left
8
branch block
8

Similar Publications

Transthyretin Cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is an increasingly recognised cause of heart failure in our elderly patients with preserved ejection fraction. Patients with ATTR-CA who require permanent pacemaker implantation often have preserved ejection fraction and do not meet the clinical indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In these patients, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) can be a reasonable option to maximise physiological activation of the left ventricle.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important issue in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and non-left bundle branch block (LBBB). Electrocardiogram-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography imaging (G-MPI SPECT) is typically used to assess left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. This study aimed to determine whether G-MPI parameters are associated with non-responsiveness to CRT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.

Heart Vessels

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is an emerging physiological pacing technique characterized by stable pacing parameters and a narrower QRS duration. This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of biventricular pacing (BIVP) and LBBP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 patients with chronic HFrEF accompanied by CLBBB treated at our center from April 2018 to October 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a rare conduction disorder in athletes associated with ventricular dyssynchrony, which can lead to left ventricular systolic dysfunction and exercise intolerance. Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is characterized by an excessive heart rate (HR) that is not related to physiological needs, often resulting in reduced exercise capacity. Managing these conditions in athletes can be challenging, as standard treatments like beta-blockers and ivabradine, while effective in controlling HR, are described to be associated with a reduction in maximal exercise performance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: to assess the relation of focal and diffuse left ventricular (LV) fibrosis to left bundle branch block (LBBB).

Materials And Methods: 60 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and LBBB (DCM-LBBB), 50 DCM-nonLBBB patients, 15 patients with LBBB and structurally normal heart (idiopathic LBBB) and 10 healthy volunteers (HV) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). LGE LV images were post-proceed for core scar (CS) and gray zone (GZ) calculation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!