BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) comprise three functional classes: Class 1 (V600E) with strong constitutive activation, Class 2 with pathogenic kinase activity lower than Class 1, and Class 3 which paradoxically lacks kinase activity. Non-Class 1 mutations associate with better prognosis, microsatellite stability, distal tumour location and better anti-EGFR response. Analysis of 13 CRC cohorts (n=6,605 tumours) compared Class 1 (n=709, 10.7% of CRCs), Class 2 (n=31, 0.47%) and Class 3 (n=81, 1.22%) mutations. Class 2- and Class 3-mutant CRCs frequently co-occurred with additional Ras pathway mutations (29.0% and 45.7% respectively vs 2.40% in Class 1, p<0.001), often at atypical sites (KRAS non-codon 12/13/61, NRAS, or NF1). Ras pathway activation was highest in Class 1 and lowest in Class 3, with greater distal expression of EGFR ligands (AREG/EREG) supporting weaker BRAF driver mutations. Unlike Class 1 mutants, Class 3 tumours resembled chromosomally-unstable CRCs in mutation burdens, signatures, driver mutations and transcriptional subtypes, while Class 2 mutants displayed intermediate characteristics. Atypical BRAF mutations were associated with longer overall survival than Class 1 (HR=0.25, p=0.011), but lost this advantage in cancers with additional Ras mutation (HR=0.93, p=0.86). This study supports the suggestion that Class 3 BRAF mutations amplify existing Ras signalling in a two-mutation model and that enhancement of weak/atypical Ras mutations may suffice for tumorigenesis, with potentially clinically-important heterogeneity in the Class 2/3 sub-group. Implications: The heterogeneous nature of BRAF-mutant CRCs, particularly among Class 2/3 mutations which frequently harbour additional Ras mutations, highlights the necessity of comprehensive molecular profiling.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-24-0464 | DOI Listing |
Background: The armamentarium of medical therapies to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to grow, which has expanded treatment options, particularly after first biologic failure. Currently, there are limited studies investigating the predictive value of first biologic primary non-response (PNR) on subsequent biologic success. Our objective was to determine if PNR to the first biologic for IBD is predictive of response to subsequent biologic therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
January 2025
Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Forestry, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Türkiye, Turkey.
Rapid urban growth is a subject of worldwide interest due to environmental problems. Population growth, especially migration from rural to urban areas, leads to land use and land cover (LULCC) changes in urban centres. Therefore, LULCC and urban growth analyses are among the studies that will help decision-makers achieve better sustainable management and planning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Rev Allergy Immunol
January 2025
Postgraduate Program in Biochemistry, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Asthma is a complex disease with varied clinical manifestations resulting from the interaction between environmental and genetic factors. While chronic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness are central features, the etiology of asthma is multifaceted, leading to a diversity of phenotypes and endotypes. Although most research into the genetics of asthma focused on the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), studies highlight the importance of structural variations, such as copy number variations (CNVs), in the inheritance of complex characteristics, but their role has not yet been fully elucidated in asthma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNPJ Precis Oncol
January 2025
Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Upregulation of Cyclin E1 and subsequent activation of CDK2 accelerates cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase and is a common oncogenic driver in gynecological malignancies. WEE1 kinase counteracts the effects of Cyclin E1/CDK2 activation by regulating multiple cell cycle checkpoints. Here we characterized the relationship between Cyclin E1/CDK2 activation and sensitivity to the selective WEE1 inhibitor azenosertib.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!