Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: APOE is the greatest genetic risk factor for AD, however, other smaller genetic effects are often ignored. In this work, endophenotype-informed polygenic scores (PGS) that exclude the APOE region were tested along with a separate, previously published, APOE neuropathology-based score (APOEscore). The APOEscore serves as a more nuanced quantification of APOE genetic risk that considers the effects of the different haplotypes. PGS and APOEscore were compared to amyloid positivity, determined via PET imaging, which is used as a measure for AD risk and progression.
Methods: Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants with genetic data and Florbetapir (F-AV-45) amyloid PET summary SUVR (whole cerebellum reference region) values were included in analyses. Amyloid positivity (A+) was defined as SUVR > 1.11. PGS were calculated using the weights from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of CSF Aβ (amyloid-PGS) or ptau (ptau-PGS), after excluding the APOE region (±500kb). APOE effects were accounted for using the APOEscore that was calculated following Deming et al (2023).
Results: 1094 participants (618 A+) were included in the analyses (Table 1). The APOEscore was significantly associated with A+ after accounting for sex and age at scan (OR = 2.931, P = 6.38e-45; Table 2). The amyloid-PGS was also significantly associated with A+ (OR = 0.492, P = 0.026), whereas the ptau-PGS did not quite reach significance (OR = 3.218, P = 0.054). After adding the APOEscore, the effect of amyloid-PGS on A+ remained but did not quite reach significance (OR = 0.515, P = 0.072) and ptau-PGS was not significant (OR = 1.845, P = 0.375).
Conclusion: These results validate the utility of the APOEscore with PET amyloid as well as the potential value of including non-APOE genes in quantifying the genetic risk for amyloid accumulation and AD. The significant association between amyloid-PGS and A+, and near significance after adding the APOEscore, demonstrates the existence of additional genetic effects outside of APOE that have an impact on amyloid accumulation. While the ptau-PGS did not reach significance, possibly due to sample size, the OR (3.218) was greater in magnitude than the amyloid-PGS (1/OR = 2.033). Future work will explore these relationships in other cohorts and with other PET AD biomarkers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.086164 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!