Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The concept of motoric cognitive risk (MCR) combines subjective cognitive concern (SCC) with slowed gait speed. The concept allows for the incorporation of cognitive and functional slowing into a measure of risk assessment. This study explores differences in cognitive functioning in cognitively unimpaired older adults with MCR and those without subjective cognitive concern and without slow gait speed.
Method: Data from 310 cognitively unimpaired participants from an epidemiological study of aging was collected. The MCR was defined as 1 standard deviation above the mean (controlled for age category and gender) for a four-meter gait speed walk test and the report of SCC. Then each participant with MCR was matched with an equivalent non-cognitively impaired participant with no SCC and matching for age, gender, and education. Two participants with MCR were excluded due to not having a match. T-tests were performed comparing performance on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and raw scores Wechsler Memory Scale III sub tests Logical Memory I, II and Digit Span, Spanish English Verbal Learning Test (SEVLT) and Trail Making Test Part B.
Result: 308 participants were included in the study with a mean age of 65.04 (8.4), mean education of 11.10 (4.72). The results showed significant differences between the MCR and no MCR groups in on the GDS t (306) = 7.99, p <.001, SEVLT immediate t (306) = -5.05, p < .001, SEVLT delayed t (306) = -4.84, p <.001, Logical Memory I t (306) = -3.79, p <.001, Logical Memory II t (306) = -4.18, p < .001, Trail Making Test Part B t (285) = 3.05, p = .003. The digit span sub test was not significant.
Conclusion: The study results demonstrate a significant difference in cognitive test performance and depression between those with MCR and without. This supports MCR as a distinct group and potentially as a tool to identify those at risk for later cognitive decline. Future research should examine the relationship between depression and MCR to determine causality, ATN markers in MCR and utility of MCR as a diagnostic category.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.084676 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!