Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: In patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the presence or absence of memory deficits is associated with divergent clinical presentations, etiologies, and prognostic outcomes. These differences may also manifest in additional neurologic signs beyond cognitive impairments and are often reflected in distinct magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) profiles. Gait is one of the clinical characteristics that reflects brain function along with cognitive function. Therefore, we aim to distinguish between amnestic MCI (aMCI) and non-aMCI (naMCI) using gait and MRI-based biomarkers.
Method: Eighty patients diagnosed with MCI from three dementia centers in Gangwon-do, Korea were recruited for this study. We defined MCI as having a Clinical Dementia Rating global score of 0.5, with a memory domain score at or above 0.5. All participants underwent the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) assessment for cognitive evaluation, gait assessment using GAITRite electronic walkway system and brain MRI. Based on CERAD, individuals with a verbal memory delayed recall score at or below -1.0 standard deviation from the norm were classified as aMCI, while those with scores higher than this threshold were categorized as naMCI. We trained a machine learning model using gait and MRI data parameters.
Result: The CNN resulted in the best classifier performance in separating aMCI from naMCI; its performance was maximized when only feature patterns that included GAIT set were used. (accuracy = 0.99 ± 0.04) The standard deviation of stride velocity and the standard deviation of stride length were the strongest predictors. Subsequently, machine learning analyses using the GAIT + WM data set (accuracy = 0.96±0.07) and the GAIT + GM dataset (0.95±0.08) demonstrated high accuracy.
Conclusion: Machine learning using GAIT data set achieved the highest accuracy in distinguishing between aMCI and naMCI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.086713 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!