Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Sporadic bvFTD is often misdiagnosed as a primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) due to overlapping clinical features and lack of reliable biomarkers. The multi-centre study DIPPA-FTD aims to develop diagnostic- and prognostic-algorithms that can distinguish sporadic bvFTD from late-onset PPD. The aim of the retrospective DIPPA-FTD study was to identify the strongest clinical discriminators.
Method: DIPPA-FTD has compiled a retrospective database with 508 sporadic bvFTD and 152 late-onset PPD cases from five cohorts, making it the largest sporadic FTD cohort to date. Logistic regression models and ROC curve analysis were applied to determine discriminative value per clinical marker in separate subsets; (i) neuropsychological features, (ii) visual brain atrophy rating scales and (iii) serum NfL+GFAP. A global (backward stepwise) logistic regression was also conducted in the most optimal subset that had all markers per modality available. All models were adjusted for age, sex and education when indicated.
Result: For marker (i) (bvFTD n = 217, PPD n = 75) higher scores of letter fluency (OR:1.47, p<0.001), global cognitive screening (OR:1.72, p = 0.01) and lower attention scores (OR:0.77, p = 0.05) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of PPD and reached an AUC of 0.77. Marker (ii) visual atrophy rating composite score (bvFTD n = 211, PPD n = 112) reached diagnostic accuracy of 79% and fronto-insula was the most useful discriminator (AUC 0.80). Analysis of marker (iii) NfL+GFAP (bvFTD n = 275, PPD n = 82) showed that NfL and GFAP levels were significantly higher in bvFTD. Combination of NfL+GFAP yielded highest AUC value (0.88). The combined dataset with all markers variables available (bvFTD n = 120, PPD n = 40) reached an AUC of 0.89. Higher NfL (OR:1.09, p<0.01), more atrophy in fronto-insula (OR:2.38, p = 0.02) and enlarged mean ventricular space (OR:3.84, p = 0.05) were significant predictors for sporadic bvFTD.
Conclusion: Global cognition, letter fluency and attention scores, fronto-insula brain atrophy and NfL+GFAP have a significant role in discriminating sporadic bvFTD from PPD. Combination of markers can increase diagnostic accuracy in clinical setting. Promising markers identified in this retrospective study will be validated in the prospective DIPPA-FTD study and integrated in a data-driven approach to develop diagnostic and prognostic tools, enabling early-stage diagnosis sporadic bvFTD which is required for trial enrolment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alz.087999 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!