A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ring Fixator Bone Transport is Associated With Fewer Unplanned Major Reoperations than Masquelet in the Treatment of Segmental Bone Defects of the Tibia. | LitMetric

Objective: To determine whether bone transport or Masquelet results in higher rates of major unplanned reoperations for the treatment of segmental tibial bone defects ≥4 cm in length.

Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Level I trauma center.

Patient Selection Criteria: Adult patients with segmental tibial defects (OTA/AO 41,42,43) ≥4 cm who underwent surgical treatment with ring fixator bone transport or Masquelet between 2011-2022 with a minimum 1-year follow-up were included.

Outcome Measures And Comparisons: The primary outcome was a major unplanned reoperation after corticotomy (bone transport) or autografting (Masquelet), including below knee amputation, surgical debridement for deep infection, or surgical intervention for nonunion. Ring fixator bone transport and Masquelet were compared using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for defect size as a potential confounder.

Results: 24 patients treated with bone transport (mean age 40yo (18-66), 100% male) and 22 patients treated with Masquelet (mean age 42yo (22-71), 91% male) were included. Defect etiology was identified as acute traumatic in 25 patients (54%) and post-infectious in 21 patients (46%) (P = 0.23). The median defect size was 7.2 cm (IQR 6.1-10.1) for transport and 5.8 cm for Masquelet (IQR 4.7-8.0) (P = 0.08). Bone transport was associated with an 85% reduction in the odds of a major unplanned reoperation compared to treatment with the Masquelet technique (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.58; P = 0.01). Bone transport patients underwent a mean of 0.38 major unplanned reoperations compared to 0.91 in the Masquelet group. Reoperation for deep infection occurred significantly less in the bone transport group (21%) compared to the Masquelet group (46%) (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.03-0.76; P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Bone transport was associated with a reduction in major reoperations compared to Masquelet for segmental tibial bone defects. This finding may have been driven by fewer surgeries for infection in the bone transport group.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002953DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone transport
44
transport masquelet
16
major unplanned
16
bone
14
ring fixator
12
fixator bone
12
transport
12
transport associated
12
bone defects
12
segmental tibial
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!