A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Optimizing Management of Febrile Young Infants Without Serum Procalcitonin. | LitMetric

Background: Febrile young infants are at risk of invasive bacterial infections (IBIs; bacteremia or bacterial meningitis). American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines recommend that when procalcitonin testing is unavailable, C-reactive protein (CRP), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and temperature should be used to identify low-risk infants. We sought to determine the optimal combination of these inflammatory markers to predict IBI when procalcitonin is unavailable.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data for all febrile infants aged 60 days or younger evaluated at a tertiary pediatric emergency department (January 2018 to July 2023). Previously healthy term infants aged 8 to 60 days with rectal temperatures of 38.0°C or greater meeting AAP inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed. A decision rule was derived by classification and regression tree analysis with 10-fold cross-validation then compared to AAP-recommended thresholds of ANC ≤ 5200/mm3, CRP ≤ 20 mg/L, and temperature ≤ 38.5°C.

Results: Among 1987 infants, 38 (1.9%) had IBIs. The AAP-recommended thresholds missed no IBIs (sensitivity: 100.0% [95% CI, 88.6%-100.0%]; negative predictive value (NPV): 100.0% [95% CI, 99.5%-100.0%]; specificity: 50.7% [95% CI, 48.5%-53.0%]). Optimal derived thresholds were CRP ≤ 22.2mg/L, temperature ≤ 39.0°C, and ANC ≤ 4500/mm3; urinalysis and age were not selected. The derived rule also missed no IBIs (sensitivity: 100.0% [95% CI, 88.6%-100.0%]; NPV: 100.0% [95% CI, 99.7%-100.0%]); however, specificity improved to 83.8% (95% CI, 82.1%-85.4%). Area under the receiver operating curve for the cross-validated rule (91.9% [95% CI, 91.1%-92.7%]) was higher than at AAP-recommended thresholds (75.4% (95% CI, 74.3%-76.5%]).

Conclusions: The combination of ANC, CRP, and temperature at statistically derived thresholds improved diagnostic accuracy for identifying infants at low risk of IBIs compared to AAP-recommended thresholds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-068200DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aap-recommended thresholds
16
1000% [95%
16
febrile young
8
young infants
8
infants aged
8
compared aap-recommended
8
missed ibis
8
ibis sensitivity
8
sensitivity 1000%
8
[95% 886%-1000%]
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!