What Is Diagnostic Stewardship?

J Appl Lab Med

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Background: Diagnostic stewardship is a set of clinically based changes to the ordering, processing, and reporting of diagnostic tests designed to improve patient outcomes (through decreased inappropriate testing, and reduced patient harm from wrong, delayed, or missed diagnosis). It shares a common philosophy with laboratory stewardship but has some key differences.

Content: Laboratory stewardship focuses primarily on pre- and post-analytical components of the testing process. Laboratory stewardship encourages laboratorians to engage clinical partners in discussion around the impact of pre- and post-analytical components of testing. Diagnostic stewardship extends laboratory stewardship into clinical medicine as it considers the clinician's interaction and experience with the ordering system and attempts to modify clinical thinking, even before a test is ordered. Diagnostic stewardship then goes beyond the post-analytic laboratory interpretation of results to contextualize those results in evidence-based best practice recommendations. Compared to laboratory stewardship, diagnostic stewardship is clinician led vs laboratorian led, utilizes clinician-focused terminology rather than laboratory-specific language, and incorporates clinician decision support and behavioral economics to drive behavior change.

Summary: There are many complementary principles and activities between laboratory and diagnostic stewardship, and collaboration allows both programs to grow and improve patient overall quality of care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae130DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic stewardship
20
laboratory stewardship
20
stewardship
10
improve patient
8
pre- post-analytical
8
post-analytical components
8
components testing
8
diagnostic
7
laboratory
7
diagnostic stewardship?
4

Similar Publications

Background: Our patient and public involvement activities were part of a project aiming to develop a master protocol and National Institute for Health and Care research application for the PROTECT trial aiming to assess the effectiveness, implementation, and efficiency of antimicrobial stewardship interventions, to safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic usage by excluding severe bacterial infection in acutely unwell patients.

Methods: Three public involvement sessions were held with representation from young people and parents, people from diverse backgrounds and people with experience of presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated illness. The teleconference meetings lasted between 60-90 minutes, were recorded, notes were subsequently taken, and findings summarised.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Infections with multi-drug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in food-animals threaten public health and food security. However, the epidemiology and factors associated with MDR Escherichia coli (MDR E. coli) on Ugandan farms are not well known.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Community isolation of patients with communicable infectious diseases limits spread of pathogens but our understanding of isolated patients' needs and challenges is incomplete. Rwanda deployed a digital health service nationally to assist public health clinicians to remotely monitor and support SARS-CoV-2 cases via their mobile phones using daily interactive short message service (SMS) check-ins. We aimed to assess the texting patterns and communicated topics to better understand patient experiences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Urinary tract infections are prone to overdiagnosis, and reflex urine culture protocols offer a valuable opportunity for diagnostic stewardship in this arena. However, there is no recommended standard testing approach. Cancer patients are often excluded from reflex urine culture protocols, especially if severely immunosuppressed or neutropenic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The impact of genetic counselor involvement in genetic and genomic test order review: A scoping review.

Genet Med

January 2025

Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Women's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address:

Purpose: The increasing complexity of genetic technologies paired with more genetic tests being ordered by nongenetic healthcare providers, has resulted in an increase in the number of inappropriately ordered tests. Genetic counselors (GCs) are ideally suited to assess the appropriateness of a genetic test.

Methods: We performed a scoping review of GC involvement in utilization management initiatives in order to describe the impact of having GCs involved in this process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!