We present a case involving a 36-year-old male who experienced a nail gun injury to the posterolateral knee, leading to intraoperative nail removal. We observed bisection of the common peroneal nerve during the procedure with tethering, fortunately without any functional or sensory deficits.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693878 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101090 | DOI Listing |
Trauma Case Rep
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, United States of America.
We present a case involving a 36-year-old male who experienced a nail gun injury to the posterolateral knee, leading to intraoperative nail removal. We observed bisection of the common peroneal nerve during the procedure with tethering, fortunately without any functional or sensory deficits.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe authors present a case of a distal phalanx fracture secondary to a nail gun injury. The diagnosis, evaluation and emergency departmetn treatment are reviewed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurosurg Case Lessons
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Background: Low-velocity penetrating brain injury (PBI) is an uncommon variant of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Patients affected by PBI can present with highly variable injury patterns, which, along with guideline-directed TBI care, may require the employment of unique operative management strategies. There are no strict guidelines for the management of low-velocity penetrating injuries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNMC Case Rep J
October 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Ergonomics
March 2024
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Passive back-assist exosuits may be beneficial for construction workers, but few evaluations have been conducted with actual workers and construction-relevant tasks. This paper presents a laboratory study of the HeroWear Apex exosuit with 35 participants: 15 with significant construction experience and 20 without it. Participants completed several approximations of brief construction tasks (lifting, carrying, raising boards) and three 3-min tasks (hunched standing, kneeling, hunched walking with a nail gun) with and without the exosuit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!