A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Irreducible Intertrochanteric Fractures: Analysis of Various Fracture Patterns and Reduction Techniques. | LitMetric

Background Numerous classifications exist for intertrochanteric (IT) fractures, commonly focused on stability. However, the currently utilized Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthesefragen and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification has limitations in identifying irreducible fractures. This study aims to answer the following questions: does fracture stability imply irreducibility; which fracture fragments complicate reduction; and which reduction techniques should be employed? Materials and methods Eligibility criteria included fractures in adult long bones without pathological fractures being treated by native conservative means. Preoperative pelvic X-rays were obtained from 49 patients who had intertrochanteric fractures and classified according to the 2018 AO Classification. Anterior-posterior pelvic X-rays were reviewed by six experienced surgeons, who reached a consensus on type, group, and subgroup classifications in this prospective observational study. The methods for intraoperative fracture reduction used by five different unit chiefs were recorded and tabulated. All fractures were reduced on a fracture table with traction and rotation and subsequently checked under C-arm imaging. Persistent non-anatomical alignment with displacement was classified as an irreducible IT fracture. Various reduction techniques, using either semi-open or open methods, were analyzed. Results Fractures classified as AO types A1.1, A1.3, and A2.1 were generally more reducible, while types A2.2, A2.3, A3.1, A3.2, and A3.3 were more frequently irreducible. Patients under 65 years of age were more likely to present with irreducible fracture patterns (P = 0.026), a statistically significant association. A semi-open method using spikes or Hohman's retractors was most commonly employed, with no preliminary cortical fixation using K-wires after reduction. Conclusion Irreducible fractures exhibit unique features on C-arm imaging, potentially leading to increased anxiety and longer operation times. Awareness of these fracture characteristics can assist surgeons in achieving effective reduction and reducing operation time. The 2018 AO classification alone does not reliably predict irreducible IT fractures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694229PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intertrochanteric fractures
12
reduction techniques
12
irreducible fractures
12
fractures
10
fracture
8
fracture patterns
8
pelvic x-rays
8
fractures classified
8
2018 classification
8
fracture reduction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!