Education Research: Has Video Killed the Interview Star?: A Survey of Current Neurology Residents on In-Person vs Virtual Residency Interviews.

Neurol Educ

From the Department of Neurology (W.A.D., A.M.S.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville; Department of Neurology (R.U.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.B.R.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (J.C.), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; Department of Neurology (A.W.), University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix; and Department of Public Health Sciences (J.T.P., A.M.S.), University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

Published: December 2024

Background And Objectives: The residency application process relies on interviews, which allow programs and applicants to assess one another. Historically, interviews were conducted in person at each program. With the advent of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, residency interviews shifted to a virtual format. Now, many specialties are choosing to return to in-person interviews. The objective of this study was to evaluate the resident perspective of virtual and in-person interviews.

Methods: We created a survey about various aspects of the residency interview process and distributed it to neurology residents in all years of training from 5 institutions across the United States. Because of the timing of survey distribution, some residents interviewed in-person while others interviewed virtually. We focused the survey on a few themes: number of applications, cost, and overall quality. Survey response data were analyzed using generalized linear models and by nonparametric methods for categorical data.

Results: Of the 164 total residents among the 5 programs, 60 completed the survey; 25 (41.7%) interviewed in-person while 35 (58.3%) interviewed virtually. Applicants who interviewed virtually applied to more programs (38.2 ± 26.6 vs 20.7 ± 7.4, < 0.001) and attended more interviews (15.4 ± 8.3 vs 11.6 ± 3.3) but received a lower percentage of interview offers (54.3% ± 23.0% vs 74.4% ± 19.8%). Applicants who interviewed in-person spent significantly more money (95% CI $2,000-3,500 vs $15-100) but were also more confident in their assessment of a program's culture (76.9% vs 17.1%) and location (56.0% vs 8.6%). When asked which method they would prefer, respondents chose the method that they were familiar with-96% of people who interviewed in-person would prefer in-person interviews while 68.6% of those who interviewed virtually would prefer virtual interviews ( < 0.001).

Discussion: There are multiple factors to consider when deciding on in-person or virtual residency interviews. In-person interviews are significantly more expensive and thus raise issues of equity but also provide better insight into the culture, location, and "fit" of programs and can help to reduce application burden. All these factors need to be considered before moving forward with a decision on residency interview formats for the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11694785PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NE9.0000000000200161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interviewed in-person
16
interviewed virtually
16
residency interviews
12
in-person interviews
12
in-person
10
interviews
10
neurology residents
8
in-person virtual
8
virtual residency
8
residency interview
8

Similar Publications

Unmasking the Environmental Costs of In-Person General Surgery Residency Interviews.

J Surg Educ

January 2025

Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Electronic address:

Objective: As COVID-19 restrictions are eased, there has been a lively debate on whether residency recruitment interviews should be held virtually or in-person. However, environmental impact has rarely been a focus of this debate and only by inference from limited survey data. In this study, we aimed to estimate the carbon emissions generated from air-travel versus in-person interviews in the general surgery residency recruitment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Virtual follow-up (VFU) has the potential to enhance cancer survivorship care. However, a greater understanding is needed of how VFU can be optimized.

Objective: This study aims to examine how, for whom, and in what contexts VFU works for cancer survivorship care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Research into human brain tissue is important for medical scientific advancement. Brain Banks worldwide allow the receipt of brains for such purposes through voluntary donation. Attitude towards organ donation can be influenced by cultural, ethical and social factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Few studies have investigated the relationship between subjective cognitive concerns and objective cognitive decline in the oldest-old or examined gender differences. We evaluated this association and stratification by gender in a diverse cohort of adults ages 90+.

Methods: LifeAfter90 is an ongoing cohort of adults ages 90+.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Deficits in decision-making (DM) can lead to adverse outcomes across multiple domains such as financial management and medical care. By hindering such DM abilities, cognitive impairment (CI) often affects quality of life. Routine screening for CI, however, does not include systematic and comprehensive assessment of DM ability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!