A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of particle size on and fat fraction estimation for accurate assessment of hepatic iron overload and steatosis using MRI. | LitMetric

Purpose: To investigate the impact of iron particle size on and fat fraction (FF) estimations for coexisting hepatic iron overload and steatosis condition using Monte Carlo simulations and phantoms.

Methods: Three iron particle sizes (0.38, 0.52, and 0.71 μm) were studied using simulations and phantoms. Virtual liver models mimicking in vivo spatial distribution of fat droplets and iron deposits were created, and MRI signals were synthesized using Monte Carlo simulations for FF 1%-30% and liver iron concentration (LIC) 1-20 mg/g. Seventy-five fat-iron phantoms with varying iron (0-8 μg/mL) and fat (0%-40%) concentrations and particle sizes were constructed. Three-way analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of iron particle size on and FF estimations.

Results: In simulations, estimated and true FF were in excellent agreement (slope: 0.93-1.09) for liver iron concentration ≤ 13 mg/g. For both simulations and phantoms, FF estimation bias increased as iron concentration increased and particle size decreased, with 0.71μm iron particle having the lowest bias (≤ 20%), and 0.52 μm and 0.38 μm iron particles producing higher bias (≥ 20%) for higher iron concentrations and lower FFs. Additionally, increased linearly with increasing iron concentration (r ≥ 0.87) and decreasing particle size. Iron particle size significantly influenced the estimated versus true FF (simulations: p = 0.04; phantoms: p = 0.03) and -iron concentration (simulations: p < 0.001; phantoms: p < 0.01) relationships. Heatmap demonstrated broader region with higher FF estimation bias as iron particle size decreased, especially at higher iron concentration.

Conclusion: and FF estimations are affected by iron particle size, with smaller particles leading to higher values and increased FF estimation bias.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30419DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

particle size
24
iron particle
20
iron concentration
16
iron
15
size fat
8
fat fraction
8
hepatic iron
8
iron overload
8
overload steatosis
8
particle
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!