A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Role of Implant Coronal Surface Properties on Early Adhesion of Streptococcus Oralis-An In Vitro Comparative Study. | LitMetric

The Role of Implant Coronal Surface Properties on Early Adhesion of Streptococcus Oralis-An In Vitro Comparative Study.

J Biomed Mater Res A

Research and Development, ZimVie Dental, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, USA.

Published: January 2025

Dental implant coronal surfaces designed with the primary goal of maintaining crestal bone levels may also promote bacterial adhesion, leading to soft tissue inflammation and peri-implant bone loss. Achieving an optimal surface roughness that minimizes bacterial adhesion while preserving crestal bone is crucial. It is hypothesized that a specific threshold surface roughness value may exist below which, and above which, initial bacterial adhesion does not statistically change. This study evaluated 12 commercially available and 2 custom-designed implant surfaces for their physicochemical properties and initial bacterial adhesion, as represented by Streptococcus oralis (S. oralis) the dominant initial colonizer of the successive waves of bacterial consortia that result in plaque and biofilm formation. Implants were immersed in a S. oralis suspension for 4 h, after which microbial viability was assessed. Marked differences were observed in surface roughness, chemical composition, and wettability, and S. oralis adhesion. Surfaces with Sa > 1 μm had significantly more adherent bacteria after 4 h compared to those with Sa < 1 μm, despite complexity. Adding nanotopography to dual-acid etched surfaces further reduced bacterial adhesion compared to surfaces without these features. The role of chemical composition and wettability was less influential than roughness. In conclusion, there is a cut-off threshold roughness around Sa = 1 μm, above which the adhesion of bacteria increases significantly to a plateau level; while below which, bacterial adhesion is equivalent to a machined surface despite the surface texture of the implant collar.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37866DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bacterial adhesion
16
surface roughness
12
implant coronal
8
crestal bone
8
initial bacterial
8
adhesion
6
bacterial
5
role implant
4
surface
4
coronal surface
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!