Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is a global foodborne pathogen that poses a significant threat to human health, with poultry being the primary reservoir host. Therefore, addressing S. Enteritidis infections in poultry is crucial to protect human health and the poultry industry. In this study, we investigated the effect of co-housing Arbor Acres (AA) chickens, a commercial breed susceptible to S. Enteritidis, with Tibetan chickens, a local breed resistant to S. Enteritidis infection, on the resistance of the latter to the pathogen.
Results: Ninety-six 1-day-old Tibetan chickens and 96 1-day-old AA chickens were divided into a Tibetan chicken housed alone group (n = 48), an AA chicken housed alone group (n = 48), and a co-housed group (48 birds from each breed for 2 cages). All birds were provided the same diet, and the experimental period lasted 14 d. At d 7, all chickens were infected with S. Enteritidis, and samples were collected at 1-, 3-, and 7-day-post-infection. We found that the body weight of AA chickens significantly increased when co-housed with Tibetan chickens at 1- and 3-day-post-infection (P < 0.05). In addition, the cecal S. Enteritidis load in AA chickens was significantly reduced at 1-, 3-, and 7-day-post-infection (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the inflammatory response in AA chickens decreased, as evidenced by the decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines NOS2, TNF-α, IL-8, IL-1β, and IFN-γ in their cecal tonsils (P < 0.05). Co-housing with Tibetan chickens significantly increased the height of villi and number of goblet cells (P < 0.05), as well as the expression of claudin-1 (P < 0.05), a tight junction protein, in the jejunum of AA chickens. Further analysis revealed that co-housing altered the gut microbiota composition in AA chickens; specifically, the relative abundances of harmful microbes, such as Intestinimonas, Oscillibacter, Tuzzerella, Anaerotruncus, Paludicola, and Anaerofilum were reduced (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that co-housing with Tibetan chickens enhanced the resistance of AA chickens to S. Enteritidis infection without compromising the resistance of Tibetan chickens. This study provides a novel approach for Salmonella control in practical poultry production.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697627 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-024-01132-2 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!