Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Although it is established that individuals with obesity are at increased risk of cardiovascular events, the relationship between cardiovascular risk and physical function in this population is still a topic of discussion. The objectives of the present study were: to check the association between cardiovascular risk and physical performance through physical-functional tests and to identify cutoff points for functional tests to be used for the definition of high cardiovascular risk.
Methods: A cross-sectional study included adults, both sexes, with obesity. Dual X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess body composition, Jamar® dynamometer to assess handgrip strength, and the sit-to-stand test to a chair with 5 repetitions and 60 s for physical performance analysis. The Framingham global risk score was used to determine cardiovascular risk.
Results: The sample consisted of 192 individuals with obesity, aged between 20 and 74 years (mean ± SD: 42.6 ± 12.7 years). The group with high cardiovascular risk presented worse values of handgrip strength and physical performance (p < 0.05). After adjusting for age, the 5× sit-to-stand test was associated (β = 0.21; OR = 1.24 [95 %CI = 1.05-1.45]; p = 0.007) with high cardiovascular risk, and the cutoff point of 16 s for performing the test was found to be discriminatory of high cardiovascular risk in obesity.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that clinical assessment tools, specifically those that assess the functionality of individuals with obesity, are related to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The 5× sit-to-stand test showed good diagnostic accuracy in this context.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132950 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!