A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Human intention recognition for trauma resuscitation: An interpretable deep learning approach for medical process data. | LitMetric

Objective: Trauma resuscitation is the initial evaluation and management of injured patients in the emergency department. This time-critical process requires the simultaneous pursuit of multiple resuscitation goals. Recognizing whether the required goal is being pursued can reduce errors in goal-related task performance and improve patient outcomes. The intention to pursue a goal can often be inferred from ongoing and completed treatment activities, but monitoring goal pursuit is cognitively demanding and prone to errors. We introduced an interpretable deep learning-based approach to aid decision making by automatically recognizing goal pursuit during trauma resuscitation.

Methods: We developed a predictive model to recognize the pursuit of two resuscitation goals: airway stabilization and circulatory support. We used event logs of 381 pediatric trauma resuscitations from August 2014 to November 2022 to train a neural network model with a dual-GRU structure that learns from both time-level and activity-type-level features. Our model makes predictions based on a sequence of activities and corresponding timestamps. To enhance the model and facilitate interpretation of predictions, we used the attention weights assigned by our model to represent the importance of features. These weights identified the critical time points and contributing activities during a goal pursuit.

Results: Our model achieved an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) score of 0.84 for recognizing airway stabilization and 0.83 for recognizing circulatory support. The most contributing activities and timestamps were aligned with domain knowledge.

Conclusion: Our interpretable predictive model can recognize provider intention based on a limited number of treatment activities. The model outperformed existing predictive models for medical events in accuracy and in interpretability. Integrating our model into a decision-support system would automate the tracking of provider actions, optimizing workflow to ensure timely delivery of care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104767DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

model
9
trauma resuscitation
8
interpretable deep
8
resuscitation goals
8
treatment activities
8
goal pursuit
8
predictive model
8
model recognize
8
airway stabilization
8
circulatory support
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!