Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To assess the accuracy of three commercially available and one open-source deep learning (DL) solutions for automatic tooth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with multiple dental impactions.
Materials And Methods: Twenty patients (20 CBCT scans) were selected from a retrospective cohort of individuals with multiple dental impactions. For each CBCT scan, one reference segmentation and four DL segmentations of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were obtained. Reference segmentations were generated by experts using a semi-automatic process. DL segmentations were automatically generated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of each DL segmentation were performed by comparing it with expert-generated segmentation. The quantitative metrics used were Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the normalized surface distance (NSD).
Results: The patients had an average of 12 retained teeth, with 12 of them diagnosed with a rare disease. DSC values ranged from 88.5% ± 3.2% to 95.6% ± 1.2%, and NSD values ranged from 95.3% ± 2.7% to 97.4% ± 6.5%. The number of completely unsegmented teeth ranged from 1 (0.1%) to 41 (6.0%). Two solutions (Diagnocat and DentalSegmentator) outperformed the others across all tested parameters.
Conclusion: All the tested methods showed a mean NSD of approximately 95%, proving their overall efficiency for tooth segmentation. The accuracy of the methods varied among the four tested solutions owing to the presence of impacted teeth in our CBCT scans. DL solutions are evolving rapidly, and their future performance cannot be predicted based on our results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12890 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!