A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Automated Cone Beam Computed Tomography Segmentation of Multiple Impacted Teeth With or Without Association to Rare Diseases: Evaluation of Four Deep Learning-Based Methods. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the accuracy of three commercial and one open-source deep learning solutions for automatic tooth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images from patients with multiple dental impactions.
  • The analysis included 20 CBCT scans and compared expert-generated segmentations with those produced by the deep learning tools, utilizing metrics like Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and normalized surface distance (NSD) for evaluation.
  • Overall, while all methods demonstrated good efficiency with average NSD around 95%, two solutions (Diagnocat and DentalSegmentator) outperformed others, highlighting variability in accuracy depending on the complexity of the cases.

Article Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of three commercially available and one open-source deep learning (DL) solutions for automatic tooth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with multiple dental impactions.

Materials And Methods: Twenty patients (20 CBCT scans) were selected from a retrospective cohort of individuals with multiple dental impactions. For each CBCT scan, one reference segmentation and four DL segmentations of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were obtained. Reference segmentations were generated by experts using a semi-automatic process. DL segmentations were automatically generated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of each DL segmentation were performed by comparing it with expert-generated segmentation. The quantitative metrics used were Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the normalized surface distance (NSD).

Results: The patients had an average of 12 retained teeth, with 12 of them diagnosed with a rare disease. DSC values ranged from 88.5% ± 3.2% to 95.6% ± 1.2%, and NSD values ranged from 95.3% ± 2.7% to 97.4% ± 6.5%. The number of completely unsegmented teeth ranged from 1 (0.1%) to 41 (6.0%). Two solutions (Diagnocat and DentalSegmentator) outperformed the others across all tested parameters.

Conclusion: All the tested methods showed a mean NSD of approximately 95%, proving their overall efficiency for tooth segmentation. The accuracy of the methods varied among the four tested solutions owing to the presence of impacted teeth in our CBCT scans. DL solutions are evolving rapidly, and their future performance cannot be predicted based on our results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12890DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cone beam
8
beam computed
8
computed tomography
8
impacted teeth
8
tooth segmentation
8
multiple dental
8
cbct scans
8
values ranged
8
segmentation
6
teeth
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!